» Articles » PMID: 34690906

Identification of Negative BOLD Responses in Epilepsy Using Windkessel Models

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Oct 25
PMID 34690906
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Alongside positive blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses associated with interictal epileptic discharges, a variety of negative BOLD responses (NBRs) are typically found in epileptic patients. Previous studies suggest that, in general, up to four mechanisms might underlie the genesis of NBRs in the brain: (i) neuronal disruption of network activity, (ii) altered balance of neurometabolic/vascular couplings, (iii) arterial blood stealing, and (iv) enhanced cortical inhibition. Detecting and classifying these mechanisms from BOLD signals are pivotal for the improvement of the specificity of the electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) image modality to identify the seizure-onset zones in refractory local epilepsy. This requires models with physiological interpretation that furnish the understanding of how these mechanisms are fingerprinted by their BOLD responses. Here, we used a Windkessel model with viscoelastic compliance/inductance in combination with dynamic models of both neuronal population activity and tissue/blood O to classify the hemodynamic response functions (HRFs) linked to the above mechanisms in the irritative zones of epileptic patients. First, we evaluated the most relevant imprints on the BOLD response caused by variations of key model parameters. Second, we demonstrated that a general linear model is enough to accurately represent the four different types of NBRs. Third, we tested the ability of a machine learning classifier, built from a simulated ensemble of HRFs, to predict the mechanism underlying the BOLD signal from irritative zones. Cross-validation indicates that these four mechanisms can be classified from realistic fMRI BOLD signals. To demonstrate proof of concept, we applied our methodology to EEG-fMRI data from five epileptic patients undergoing neurosurgery, suggesting the presence of some of these mechanisms. We concluded that a proper identification and interpretation of NBR mechanisms in epilepsy can be performed by combining general linear models and biophysically inspired models.

Citing Articles

Characterizing astrocyte-mediated neurovascular coupling by combining optogenetics and biophysical modeling.

Suarez A, Fernandez L, Riera J J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025; 271678X241311010.

PMID: 39791314 PMC: 11719438. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X241311010.


Prediction of white matter hyperintensities evolution one-year post-stroke from a single-point brain MRI and stroke lesions information.

Rachmadi M, Valdes-Hernandez M, Makin S, Wardlaw J, Skibbe H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1208.

PMID: 39774013 PMC: 11706948. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83128-6.


Functional Deficiency of Interneurons and Negative BOLD fMRI Response.

Aksenov D, Li L, Serdyukova N, Gascoigne D, Doubovikov E, Drobyshevsky A Cells. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 36899947 PMC: 10000915. DOI: 10.3390/cells12050811.


Arterial blood stealing as a mechanism of negative BOLD response: From the steady-flow with nonlinear phase separation to a windkessel-based model.

Suarez A, Valdes-Hernandez P, Moshkforoush A, Tsoukias N, Riera J J Theor Biol. 2021; 529:110856.

PMID: 34363836 PMC: 8507599. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110856.

References
1.
Suarez A, Valdes-Hernandez P, Moshkforoush A, Tsoukias N, Riera J . Arterial blood stealing as a mechanism of negative BOLD response: From the steady-flow with nonlinear phase separation to a windkessel-based model. J Theor Biol. 2021; 529:110856. PMC: 8507599. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110856. View

2.
Wade A . The negative BOLD signal unmasked. Neuron. 2002; 36(6):993-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01138-8. View

3.
Huber L, Goense J, Kennerley A, Ivanov D, Krieger S, Lepsien J . Investigation of the neurovascular coupling in positive and negative BOLD responses in human brain at 7 T. Neuroimage. 2014; 97:349-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.022. View

4.
Polimeni J, Uludag K . Neuroimaging with ultra-high field MRI: Present and future. Neuroimage. 2018; 168:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.072. View

5.
Makni S, Idier J, Vincent T, Thirion B, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Ciuciu P . A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI. Neuroimage. 2008; 41(3):941-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.017. View