» Articles » PMID: 34687438

Extracellular Buffering Supplements to Improve Exercise Capacity and Performance: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Oct 23
PMID 34687438
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extracellular buffering supplements [sodium bicarbonate (SB), sodium citrate (SC), sodium/calcium lactate (SL/CL)] are ergogenic supplements, although questions remain about factors which may modify their effect.

Objective: To quantify the main effect of extracellular buffering agents on exercise outcomes, and to investigate the influence of potential moderators on this effect using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach.

Methods: This study was designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three databases were searched for articles that were screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis and meta-regression models were used to investigate pooled effects of supplementation and moderating effects of a range of factors on exercise and biomarker responses.

Results: 189 articles with 2019 participants were included, 158 involving SB supplementation, 30 with SC, and seven with CL/SL; four studies provided a combination of buffering supplements together. Supplementation led to a mean estimated increase in blood bicarbonate of + 5.2 mmol L (95% credible interval (CrI) 4.7-5.7). The meta-analysis models identified a positive overall effect of supplementation on exercise capacity and performance compared to placebo [ES = 0.17 (95% CrI 0.12-0.21)] with potential moderating effects of exercise type and duration, training status and when the exercise test was performed following prior exercise. The greatest ergogenic effects were shown for exercise durations of 0.5-10 min [ES = 0.18 (0.13-0.24)] and > 10 min [ES = 0.22 (0.10-0.33)]. Evidence of greater effects on exercise were obtained when blood bicarbonate increases were medium (4-6 mmol L) and large (> 6 mmol L) compared with small (≤ 4 mmol L) [β = 0.16 (95% CrI 0.02-0.32), β = 0.13 (95% CrI - 0.03 to 0.29)]. SB (192 outcomes) was more effective for performance compared to SC (39 outcomes) [β = 0.10 (95% CrI - 0.02 to 0.22)].

Conclusions: Extracellular buffering supplements generate large increases in blood bicarbonate concentration leading to positive overall effects on exercise, with sodium bicarbonate being most effective. Evidence for several group-level moderating factors were identified. These data can guide an athlete's decision as to whether supplementation with buffering agents might be beneficial for their specific aims.

Citing Articles

Lactic acidosis: implications for human exercise performance.

Cairns S, Lindinger M Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40088272 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05750-0.


Enhancing exercise performance and recovery through sodium bicarbonate supplementation: introducing the ingestion recovery framework.

Gurton W, King D, Ranchordas M, Siegler J, Gough L Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(11):3175-3190.

PMID: 39177769 PMC: 11519211. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05578-0.


The effect of sodium bicarbonate mini-tablets ingested in a carbohydrate hydrogel system on 40 km cycling time trial performance and metabolism in trained male cyclists.

Shannon E, Regnier A, Dobson B, Yang X, Sparks S, Mc Naughton L Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(12):3671-3682.

PMID: 39068627 PMC: 11568979. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05567-3.


Sodium bicarbonate and beta-alanine supplementation: Is combining both better than either alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Curran-Bowen T, Guedes da Silva A, Barreto G, Buckley J, Saunders B Biol Sport. 2024; 41(3):79-87.

PMID: 38952910 PMC: 11167468. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.132997.


Nutritional Ergogenic Aids in Cycling: A Systematic Review.

Valino-Marques A, Lamas A, Miranda J, Cepeda A, Regal P Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892701 PMC: 11174392. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111768.


References
1.
Heibel A, Perim P, Oliveira L, McNaughton L, Saunders B . Time to Optimize Supplementation: Modifying Factors Influencing the Individual Responses to Extracellular Buffering Agents. Front Nutr. 2018; 5:35. PMC: 5951986. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00035. View

2.
Allen D, Lamb G, Westerblad H . Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2008; 88(1):287-332. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2007. View

3.
Fitts R . Cellular mechanisms of muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev. 1994; 74(1):49-94. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.49. View

4.
Jarvis K, Woodward M, Debold E, Walcott S . Acidosis affects muscle contraction by slowing the rates myosin attaches to and detaches from actin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2018; 39(3-4):135-147. DOI: 10.1007/s10974-018-9499-7. View

5.
Sundberg C, Hunter S, Trappe S, Smith C, Fitts R . Effects of elevated H and P on the contractile mechanics of skeletal muscle fibres from young and old men: implications for muscle fatigue in humans. J Physiol. 2018; 596(17):3993-4015. PMC: 6117549. DOI: 10.1113/JP276018. View