» Articles » PMID: 34684541

Practical School Nutrition Program May Reduce Food Neophobia

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2021 Oct 23
PMID 34684541
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study's purpose was to evaluate an intervention to reduce fruit and vegetable food neophobia and influence attitudes and behaviors among children using a four-month, non-experimental, before-and-after intervention. Participants were children aged 5-11 years in an intervention school (IS) and a control school (CS). Children were offered fruit or vegetable samples weekly utilizing school-specific psychosocial and educational practices to encourage participation. The outcomes of interest included attitudes measured using a written survey-based food neophobia scale (FNS), behavioral observations, and an oral survey. The post-intervention IS FNS score was significantly lower compared to pre-intervention ( = 0.04). Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a statistically significant overall effect of time ( = 0.006). School type-time interaction was not significant ( = 0.57). Pre-intervention observational data showed the proportions finishing and taking another fruit and vegetable sample were higher in the CS ( < 0.001 for both). Post-intervention, the proportions taking the vegetable ( = 0.007) and the fruit ( < 0.001) were higher in the IS. The percentage tasting the vegetable was higher in the CS ( = 0.009). Offering samples of produce in school lunchrooms may reduce food neophobia. This intervention is an inexpensive program that volunteers can quickly implement.

Citing Articles

A PRECEDE-PROCEED model-based educational intervention to promote healthy eating habits in middle school girls.

Arshad A, Shaheen F, Safdar W, Tariq M, Navid M, Qazi A Food Sci Nutr. 2023; 11(3):1318-1327.

PMID: 36911841 PMC: 10002990. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3167.

References
1.
Vandeweghe L, Verbeken S, Moens E, Vervoort L, Braet C . Strategies to improve the Willingness to Taste: The moderating role of children's Reward Sensitivity. Appetite. 2016; 103:344-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.017. View

2.
Lorson B, Melgar-Quinonez H, Taylor C . Correlates of fruit and vegetable intakes in US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(3):474-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.022. View

3.
Blanchette L, Brug J . Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among 6-12-year-old children and effective interventions to increase consumption. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005; 18(6):431-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00648.x. View

4.
Cruwys T, Bevelander K, Hermans R . Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. Appetite. 2014; 86:3-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.035. View

5.
Pliner P, Hobden K . Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 1992; 19(2):105-20. DOI: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w. View