» Articles » PMID: 34677144

Controversies in ERCP: Technical Aspects

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 22
PMID 34677144
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the series of papers on controversies of biliopancreatic drainage procedures is to discuss pros and cons of the varying clinical practices and techniques in ERCP and EUS for drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts. While the first part focuses on indications, clinical and imaging prerequisites prior to ERCP, sedation options, post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis, and other related technical topics, the second part discusses specific procedural ERCP techniques including precut techniques and their timing as well as management algorithms. In addition, reviews on controversies in EUS-guided bile duct and pancreatic drainage procedures are under preparation.

Citing Articles

Sex-related association between smoke exposure and gallstones in a US population: a cross-sectional study.

Huang X, Hao X, Wang T, Zhang X, Wu P, Shen L BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):344.

PMID: 39871261 PMC: 11773891. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21173-6.


[Imaging in chronic inflammatory bowel disease].

Dietrich C, Moller K Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024; 66(1):40-54.

PMID: 39704791 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-024-01831-y.


Standard Cannulation versus Fistulotomy for Biliary Access in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Should We Expect the Same Success when Treating Choledocholithiasis?.

Moreira M, Tarrio I, Andrade A, Araujo T, Fernandes J, Canena J GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024; 31(6):401-407.

PMID: 39633909 PMC: 11614427. DOI: 10.1159/000536398.


Pancreatic ultrasound: An update of measurements, reference values, and variations of the pancreas.

Meier J, Lucius C, Moller K, Jenssen C, Zervides C, Gschmack A Ultrasound Int Open. 2024; 10:a23899085.

PMID: 39411753 PMC: 11475099. DOI: 10.1055/a-2389-9085.


Real-world evidence comparing early and late pancreatic stent placement to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Wang S, Bai B, Huang Q, Fang Y, Zhang C, Chen X Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(10):E1162-E1170.

PMID: 39411361 PMC: 11479794. DOI: 10.1055/a-2409-1285.


References
1.
Maydeo A, Bhandari S . Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2007; 39(11):958-61. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966784. View

2.
Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P . Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2019; 51(5):472-491. DOI: 10.1055/a-0862-0346. View

3.
Freeman M . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review. Endoscopy. 1997; 29(4):288-97. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004193. View

4.
Heo J, Kang D, Jung H, Kwon D, An J, Kim B . Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66(4):720-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.033. View

5.
Koksal A, Eminler A, Parlak E . Biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy: Techniques and complications. World J Clin Cases. 2019; 6(16):1073-1086. PMC: 6306628. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1073. View