» Articles » PMID: 34677130

Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease As a Foundation for EHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

Background: eHealth interventions are developed to support and facilitate patients with lifestyle changes and self-care tasks after being diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). Creating long-lasting effects on lifestyle change and health outcomes with eHealth interventions is challenging and requires good understanding of patient values.

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify values of importance to patients with CVD to aid in designing a technological lifestyle platform.

Methods: A mixed method design was applied, combining data from usability testing with an additional online survey study, to validate the outcomes of the usability tests.

Results: A total of 11 relevant patient values were identified, including the need for security, support, not wanting to feel anxious, tailoring of treatment, and personalized, accessible care. The validation survey shows that all values but one (value 9: To have extrinsic motivation to accomplish goals or activities [related to health/lifestyle]) were regarded as important/very important. A rating of very unimportant or unimportant was given by less than 2% of the respondents (value 1: 4/641, 0.6%; value 2: 10/641, 1.6%; value 3: 9/641, 1.4%; value 4: 5/641, 0.8%; value 5: 10/641, 1.6%; value 6: 4/641, 0.6%; value 7: 10/639, 1.6%; value 8: 4/639, 0.6%; value 10: 3/636, 0.5%; value 11: 4/636, 0.6%) to all values except but one (value 9: 56/636, 8.8%).

Conclusions: There is a high consensus among patients regarding the identified values reflecting goals and themes central to their lives, while living with or managing their CVD. The identified values can serve as a foundation for future research to translate and integrate these values into the design of the eHealth technology. This may call for prioritization of values, as not all values can be met equally.

Citing Articles

Cardiac Rehabilitation practitioners' views on patients' psychological needs: a qualitative study.

Wray L, Capobianco L, Wells A Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1434779.

PMID: 39421069 PMC: 11484254. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1434779.


Development of a patient-centered app in Germany as a special health and organizational support by surveying patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Oettinger V, Zimmermann J, von Zur Muhlen C, Kaier K, Faber T, Paulus T Clin Res Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39285008 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02542-y.


Tailoring remote patient management in cardiovascular risk management for healthcare professionals using panel management: a qualitative study.

Rakers M, van Hattem N, Simic I, Chavannes N, van Peet P, Bonten T BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):122.

PMID: 38643103 PMC: 11031879. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02355-y.


Targeting behavioral factors with digital health and shared decision-making to promote cardiac rehabilitation-a narrative review.

Hoppchen I, Wurhofer D, Meschtscherjakov A, Smeddinck J, Kulnik S Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1324544.

PMID: 38463944 PMC: 10920294. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1324544.


Implementation and User Evaluation of an eHealth Technology Platform Supporting Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in Managing Their Health After a Cardiac Event: Mixed Methods Study.

Bente B, Wentzel J, Schepers C, Breeman L, Janssen V, Pieterse M JMIR Cardio. 2023; 7:e43781.

PMID: 36961491 PMC: 10131764. DOI: 10.2196/43781.


References
1.
Ten Klooster I, Wentzel J, Sieverink F, Linssen G, Wesselink R, van Gemert-Pijnen L . Personas for Better Targeted eHealth Technologies: User-Centered Design Approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022; 9(1):e24172. PMC: 8965674. DOI: 10.2196/24172. View

2.
Papandony M, Chou L, Seneviwickrama M, Cicuttini F, Lasserre K, Teichtahl A . Patients' perceived health service needs for osteoarthritis (OA) care: a scoping systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017; 25(7):1010-1025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.799. View

3.
Jaarsma T, Cameron J, Riegel B, Stromberg A . Factors Related to Self-Care in Heart Failure Patients According to the Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness: a Literature Update. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017; 14(2):71-77. PMC: 5357484. DOI: 10.1007/s11897-017-0324-1. View

4.
Asbjornsen R, Wentzel J, Smedsrod M, Hjelmesaeth J, Clark M, Solberg Nes L . Identifying Persuasive Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques Supporting End User Values and Needs in eHealth Interventions for Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e22598. PMC: 7735908. DOI: 10.2196/22598. View

5.
Kessing D, Denollet J, Widdershoven J, Kupper N . Psychological Determinants of Heart Failure Self-Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychosom Med. 2016; 78(4):412-31. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000270. View