» Articles » PMID: 34669000

Effect of Activated Carbon in Thin Sand Caps Challenged with Ongoing PCB Inputs from Sediment Deposition: PCB Uptake in Clams (Mercenaria Mercenaria) and Passive Samplers

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 20
PMID 34669000
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ongoing inputs, in the form of sediment deposition along with associated dissolved contaminants, have challenged the assessment of cap performance at contaminated sediment sites. To address this issue, thin 2-3 cm layer sand caps amended with activated carbon (AC) were investigated for the remediation of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contaminated marine sediments using 90-day mesocosms. All treatments were challenged with (1) ongoing clean or marker-PCB-spiked sediment inputs and (2) bioturbation. Bioaccumulation in hard clams (filter feeding near the cap-water interface) was evaluated to best understand cap effectiveness, relative to sheepshead minnows (confined to the surface water) and sandworms (which burrowed through the caps). All caps (sand and AC amended sand) provided isolation of native bedded PCBs (i.e., PCBs sourced from the bed), reducing uptake in organisms. Total PCB bioaccumulation in clams indicated that AC addition to the cap provided no benefit with spiked influx, or some benefit (56% reduction) with clean influx. Spiked input PCBs, when added to the depositional input sediment, were consistently detected in clams and passive samplers, with and without AC in the cap. PCB uptake by passive samplers located in the caps did not reflect the performance of the remedy, as defined by clam bioaccumulation. However, PCB uptake by passive samplers in the overlying water reasonably represented clam bioaccumulation results.

Citing Articles

Bioaccumulation in fish (Cyprinodon variegatus) during rejuvenations of a thin active cap over field-aged PCB contaminated sediment: The effect of clean versus contaminated ongoing influx.

Gidley P, Lotufo G, Kennedy A, Fernandez L, Laber C, Melby N Sci Total Environ. 2024; 955():176986.

PMID: 39433226 PMC: 11727888. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176986.


Quantitative thermodynamic exposure assessment of PCBs available to sandworms () in activated carbon remediated sediment during ongoing sediment deposition.

Gidley P, Lotufo G, Schmidt S, Mayer P, Burgess R Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2024; 26(5):814-823.

PMID: 38345076 PMC: 11179148. DOI: 10.1039/d3em00405h.


Passive Sampling-Based versus Conventional-Based Metrics for Evaluating Remediation Efficacy at Contaminated Sediment Sites: A Review.

Grundy J, Lambert M, Burgess R Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(28):10151-10172.

PMID: 37364241 PMC: 10404352. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00232.

References
1.
Samuelsson G, Hedman J, Elmquist Krusa M, Gunnarsson J, Cornelissen G . Capping in situ with activated carbon in Trondheim harbor (Norway) reduces bioaccumulation of PCBs and PAHs in marine sediment fauna. Mar Environ Res. 2015; 109:103-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.06.003. View

2.
Schmidt S, Burgess R . Evaluating Polymeric Sampling as a Tool for Predicting the Bioaccumulation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Fish and Shellfish. Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 54(16):9729-9741. PMC: 7478847. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07292. View

3.
Merritt K, Conder J, Kirtay V, Chadwick D, Magar V . Review of thin-layer placement applications to enhance natural recovery of contaminated sediment. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010; 6(4):749-60. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.76. View

4.
Gidley P, Kennedy A, Lotufo G, Wooley A, Melby N, Ghosh U . Bioaccumulation in Functionally Different Species: Ongoing Input of PCBs with Sediment Deposition to Activated Carbon Remediated Bed Sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019; 38(10):2326-2336. PMC: 6993789. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4526. View

5.
Albarano L, Costantini M, Zupo V, Lofrano G, Guida M, Libralato G . Marine sediment toxicity: A focus on micro- and mesocosms towards remediation. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 708:134837. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134837. View