» Articles » PMID: 34666942

A Challenge to Equity in Transplantation: Increased Center-level Variation in Short-term Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in the Context of the Updated U.S. Heart Transplant Allocation Policy

Abstract

Background: The United States National Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) implemented changes to the adult heart allocation system to reduce waitlist mortality by improving access for those at greater risk of pre-transplant death, including patients on short-term mechanical circulatory support (sMCS). While sMCS increased, it is unknown whether the increase occurred equitably across centers.

Methods: The OPTN database was used to assess changes in use of sMCS at time of transplant in the 12 months before (pre-change) and after (post-change) implementation of the allocation system in October 2018 among 5,477 heart transplant recipients. An interrupted time series analysis comparing use of bridging therapies pre- and post-change was performed. Variability in the proportion of sMCS use at the center level pre- and post-change was determined.

Results: In the month pre-change, 9.7% of patients were transplanted with sMCS. There was an immediate increase in sMCS transplant the following month to 32.4% - an absolute and relative increase of 22.7% and 312% (p < 0.001). While sMCS use was stable pre-change (monthly change 0.0%, 95% CI [-0.1%,0.1%]), there was a continuous 1.2%/month increase post-change ([0.6%,1.8%], p < 0.001). Center-level variation in sMCS use increased substantially after implementation, from a median (interquartile range) of 3.85% (10%) pre-change to 35.7% (30.6%) post-change (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Use of sMCS at time of transplant increased immediately and continued to expand following heart allocation policy changes. Center-level variation in use of sMCS at the time of transplant increased compared to pre-change, which may have negatively impacted equitable access to heart transplantation.

Citing Articles

Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States.

Dale R, Cheng M, Pines K, Currie M BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):115.

PMID: 39420378 PMC: 11483980. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x.


Heart Transplantation.

Chrysakis N, Magouliotis D, Spiliopoulos K, Athanasiou T, Briasoulis A, Triposkiadis F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256691 PMC: 10816008. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020558.


The Association of the UNOS Heart Allocation Policy Change With Transplant and Left Ventricular Assist Device Access and Outcomes.

Fox D, Waken R, Wang F, Wolfe J, Robbins K, Fanous E Am J Cardiol. 2023; 204:392-400.

PMID: 37586314 PMC: 10950424. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.090.


The impact of obesity and LVAD-bridging on heart transplant candidate outcomes: a linked STS INTERMACS - OPTN/UNOS data analysis.

Alba A, Kirklin J, Cantor R, Deng L, Ross H, Jacobs J J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023; 42(11):1587-1596.

PMID: 37385418 PMC: 10640766. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.06.003.


Greater geographic sharing and heart transplantation waitlist outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy.

Golbus J, Li J, Cascino T, Tang W, Zhu J, Colvin M J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023; 42(7):936-942.

PMID: 36931987 PMC: 10551820. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.003.