» Articles » PMID: 34665300

Strength of Interference Screw Fixation of Meniscus Prosthesis Matches Native Meniscus Attachments

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Oct 19
PMID 34665300
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Meniscal surgery is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical interventions. Total meniscus replacements have been proposed as a solution for patients with irreparable meniscal injuries. Reliable fixation is crucial for the success and functionality of such implants. The aim of this study was to characterise an interference screw fixation system developed for a novel fibre-matrix-reinforced synthetic total meniscus replacement in an ovine cadaveric model.

Methods: Textile straps were tested in tension to failure (n = 15) and in cyclic tension (70-220 N) for 1000 cycles (n = 5). The textile strap-interference screw fixation system was tested in 4.5 mm-diameter single anterior and double posterior tunnels in North of England Mule ovine tibias aged > 2 years using titanium alloy (Ti6Al4Va) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) screws (n ≥ 5). Straps were preconditioned, dynamically loaded for 1000 cycles in tension (70-220 N), the fixation slippage under cyclic loading was measured, and then pulled to failure.

Results: Strap stiffness was at least 12 times that recorded for human meniscal roots. Strap creep strain at the maximum load (220 N) was 0.005 following 1000 cycles. For all tunnels, pull-out failure resulted from textile strap slippage or bone fracture rather than strap rupture, which demonstrated that the textile strap was comparatively stronger than the interference screw fixation system. Pull-out load (anterior 544 ± 119 N; posterior 889 ± 157 N) was comparable to human meniscal root strength. Fixation slippage was within the acceptable range for anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction (anterior 1.9 ± 0.7 mm; posterior 1.9 ± 0.5 mm).

Conclusion: These findings show that the textile attachment-interference screw fixation system provides reliable fixation for a novel ovine meniscus implant, supporting progression to in vivo testing. This research provides a baseline for future development of novel human meniscus replacements, in relation to attachment design and fixation methods. The data suggest that surgical techniques familiar from ligament reconstruction may be used for the fixation of clinical meniscal prostheses.

Citing Articles

An ovine knee simulator: description and proof of concept.

Bartolo M, Newman S, Dandridge O, Halewood C, Accardi M, Dini D Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1410053.

PMID: 38994124 PMC: 11237960. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1410053.


The Current State of Meniscus Replacements.

van Minnen B, van Tienen T Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024; 17(8):293-302.

PMID: 38744802 PMC: 11219664. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09902-1.


The safety and effectiveness comparison of Delta Medical's PEEK interface screw and Endobutton and that of Smith & Nephew's in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A multicenter prospective double-blind randomized controlled....

Gao P, Yuan M, Xu Y, Wu Y, Lin X, Li Y Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1003591.

PMID: 36419987 PMC: 9676447. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003591.


Categorize the existing clamps used for tensile test of human graft- a systematic review.

Farago D, Kozma B, Kiss R BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):707.

PMID: 35879684 PMC: 9316330. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05650-w.

References
1.
Abram S, Judge A, Beard D, Price A . Adverse outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a study of 700 000 procedures in the national Hospital Episode Statistics database for England. Lancet. 2018; 392(10160):2194-2202. PMC: 6238020. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31771-9. View

2.
Aga C, Rasmussen M, Smith S, Jansson K, LaPrade R, Engebretsen L . Biomechanical comparison of interference screws and combination screw and sheath devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the tibial side. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(4):841-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512474968. View

3.
Coleridge S, Amis A . A comparison of five tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004; 12(5):391-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0488-y. View

4.
Ellman M, LaPrade C, Smith S, Rasmussen M, Engebretsen L, Wijdicks C . Structural Properties of the Meniscal Roots. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(8):1881-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514531730. View

5.
Espejo-Reina A, Aguilera J, Espejo-Reina M, Espejo-Reina M, Espejo-Baena A . One-Third of Meniscal Tears Are Repairable: An Epidemiological Study Evaluating Meniscal Tear Patterns in Stable and Unstable Knees. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(3):857-863. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.051. View