» Articles » PMID: 34663880

Unravelling Roles of Error-prone DNA Polymerases in Shaping Cancer Genomes

Overview
Journal Oncogene
Date 2021 Oct 19
PMID 34663880
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutagenesis is a key hallmark and enabling characteristic of cancer cells, yet the diverse underlying mutagenic mechanisms that shape cancer genomes are not understood. This review will consider the emerging challenge of determining how DNA damage response pathways-both tolerance and repair-act upon specific forms of DNA damage to generate mutations characteristic of tumors. DNA polymerases are typically the ultimate mutagenic effectors of DNA repair pathways. Therefore, understanding the contributions of DNA polymerases is critical to develop a more comprehensive picture of mutagenic mechanisms in tumors. Selection of an appropriate DNA polymerase-whether error-free or error-prone-for a particular DNA template is critical to the maintenance of genome stability. We review different modes of DNA polymerase dysregulation including mutation, polymorphism, and over-expression of the polymerases themselves or their associated activators. Based upon recent findings connecting DNA polymerases with specific mechanisms of mutagenesis, we propose that compensation for DNA repair defects by error-prone polymerases may be a general paradigm molding the mutational landscape of cancer cells. Notably, we demonstrate that correlation of error-prone polymerase expression with mutation burden in a subset of patient tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas can identify mechanistic hypotheses for further testing. We contrast experimental approaches from broad, genome-wide strategies to approaches with a narrower focus on a few hundred base pairs of DNA. In addition, we consider recent developments in computational annotation of patient tumor data to identify patterns of mutagenesis. Finally, we discuss the innovations and future experiments that will develop a more comprehensive portrait of mutagenic mechanisms in human tumors.

Citing Articles

TRIP13 protects pancreatic cancer cells against intrinsic and therapy-induced DNA replication stress.

Anand J, Droby G, Joseph S, Patel U, Zhang X, Klomp J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975297 PMC: 11838190. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634889.


Synergistic Cytotoxicity of Histone Deacetylase and Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors and Decitabine in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cells: Implications for Novel Therapeutic Combinations.

Valdez B, Tsimberidou A, Yuan B, Baysal M, Chakraborty A, Andersen C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273190 PMC: 11394699. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179241.


Melanoma-Derived DNA Polymerase Theta Variants Exhibit Altered DNA Polymerase Activity.

Thomas C, Avalos-Irving L, Victorino J, Green S, Andrews M, Rodrigues N Biochemistry. 2024; 63(9):1107-1117.

PMID: 38671548 PMC: 11080051. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00670.


Adaptive use of error-prone DNA polymerases provides flexibility in genome replication during tumorigenesis.

Bainbridge L, Daigaku Y Cancer Sci. 2024; 115(7):2125-2137.

PMID: 38651239 PMC: 11247608. DOI: 10.1111/cas.16188.


Biological Basis of Breast Cancer-Related Disparities in Precision Oncology Era.

Neagu A, Bruno P, Johnson K, Ballestas G, Darie C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612922 PMC: 11012526. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25074113.


References
1.
Hu X, Xu Z, De S . Characteristics of mutational signatures of unknown etiology. NAR Cancer. 2020; 2(3):zcaa026. PMC: 7520824. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcaa026. View

2.
Shachar S, Ziv O, Avkin S, Adar S, Wittschieben J, Reissner T . Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J. 2009; 28(4):383-93. PMC: 2646147. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2008.281. View

3.
Ziv O, Geacintov N, Nakajima S, Yasui A, Livneh Z . DNA polymerase zeta cooperates with polymerases kappa and iota in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(28):11552-7. PMC: 2710681. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812548106. View

4.
Wang Y, Woodgate R, McManus T, Mead S, McCormick J, Maher V . Evidence that in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells, which lack DNA polymerase eta, DNA polymerase iota causes the very high frequency and unique spectrum of UV-induced mutations. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(7):3018-26. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3073. View

5.
Mannava S, Moparthy K, Wheeler L, Natarajan V, Zucker S, Fink E . Depletion of deoxyribonucleotide pools is an endogenous source of DNA damage in cells undergoing oncogene-induced senescence. Am J Pathol. 2012; 182(1):142-51. PMC: 3532713. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.09.011. View