» Articles » PMID: 34663330

Diverse Community Leaders' Perspectives About Quality Primary Healthcare and Healthcare Measurement: Qualitative Community-based Participatory Research

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Oct 19
PMID 34663330
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Healthcare quality measurements in the United States illustrate disparities by racial/ethnic group, socio-economic class, and geographic location. Redressing healthcare inequities, including measurement of and reimbursement for healthcare quality, requires partnering with communities historically excluded from decision-making. Quality healthcare is measured according to insurers, professional organizations and government agencies, with little input from diverse communities. This community-based participatory research study aimed to amplify the voices of community leaders from seven diverse urban communities in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Minnesota, view quality healthcare and financial reimbursement based on quality metric scores.

Methods: A Community Engagement Team consisting of one community member from each of seven urban communities -Black/African American, Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer-Two Spirit, Hmong, Latino/a/x, Native American, Somali, and White-and two community-based researchers conducted listening sessions with 20 community leaders about quality primary healthcare. Transcripts were inductively analyzed and major themes were identified.

Results: Listening sessions produced three major themes, with recommended actions for primary care clinics. #1: Quality Clinics Utilize Structures and Processes that Support Healthcare Equity. #2: Quality Clinics Offer Effective Relationships, Education, and Health Promotion. #3: Funding Based on Current Quality Measures Perpetuates Health Inequities.

Conclusion: Community leaders identified ideal characteristics of quality primary healthcare, most of which are not currently measured. They expressed concern that linking clinic payment with quality metrics without considering social and structural determinants of health perpetuates social injustice in healthcare.

Citing Articles

Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.

Endalamaw A, Erku D, Khatri R, Nigatu F, Wolka E, Zewdie A Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):100.

PMID: 37268966 PMC: 10236853. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01116-0.


Action learning and public health pedagogy: Student reflections from an experiential public health course.

Pham C, Cunningham S, Humphries D Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1128705.

PMID: 37056658 PMC: 10086179. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128705.


Culturally and linguistically diverse patients' perspectives and experiences on medicines management in Australia: a systematic review.

Sawalha R, Hosseinzadeh H, Bajorek B Int J Clin Pharm. 2023; 45(4):814-829.

PMID: 37020057 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01560-6.


When primary healthcare meets queerstory: community-based system dynamics influencing regional/rural LGBTQ + people's access to quality primary healthcare in Australia.

Lucas J, Afrouz R, Brown A, Epstein S, Ryan J, Hayward J BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):387.

PMID: 36823585 PMC: 9951531. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15289-4.


Implementation and evaluation of the peer-training program for village health volunteers to improve chronic disease management among older adults in rural Thailand.

Pitchalard K, Moonpanane K, Wimolphan P, Singkhorn O, Wongsuraprakit S Int J Nurs Sci. 2022; 9(3):328-333.

PMID: 35891909 PMC: 9305007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.011.


References
1.
de Torrente A, Glazer G, GULYASSY P . Reduced in vitro binding of tryptophan by plasma in uremia. Kidney Int. 1974; 6(4):222-9. DOI: 10.1038/ki.1974.103. View

2.
McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K . Incentives and control in primary health care: findings from English pay-for-performance case studies. J Health Organ Manag. 2008; 22(1):48-62. DOI: 10.1108/14777260810862407. View

3.
Milstein R, Schreyoegg J . Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries. Health Policy. 2016; 120(10):1125-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.08.009. View

4.
Hong C, Atlas S, Chang Y, Subramanian S, Ashburner J, Barry M . Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA. 2010; 304(10):1107-13. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1287. View

5.
WHALLEY P, Scott D, PRITCHARD J . Maternal folate deficiency and pregnancy wastage. 3. Pregnancy-induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 36(1):29-31. View