» Articles » PMID: 34660360

Prediction of Outcome Based on Trauma and Injury Severity Score, IMPACT and CRASH Prognostic Models in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Oct 18
PMID 34660360
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), IMPACT (international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials), and CRASH (corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury) prognostic models for prediction of outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the elderly following road traffic accident.

Design: This was a prospective observational study.

Materials And Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 104 elderly trauma patients who were admitted to tertiary care hospital, over a consecutive period of 18 months from December 2016 to May 2018. On the day of admission, data were collected from each patient to compute the TRISS, IMPACT, and CRASH and outcome evaluation was prospectively done at discharge, 14 day, and 6-month follow-up.

Results: This study included 104 TBI patients with a mean age of 66.75 years and with a mortality rate of 32% and 45%, respectively, at discharge and at the end of 6 months. The predictive accuracies of the TRISS, CRASH (computed tomography), and IMPACT (core, extended, laboratory) were calculated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the prediction of mortality. Best cutoff point for predicting mortality in elderly TBI patients using TRISS system was a score of ≤88 (sensitivity 94%, specificity of 80%, and area under ROC curve 0.95), similarly cutoff point under the CRASH at 14 days was score of >35 (100%, 80%, 0.958); for CRASH at 6 months, best cutoff point was at >84 (88%, 88%, 0.959); for IMPACT (core), it was >38 (88%, 93%, 0.976); for IMPACT (extended), it was >27 (91%, 89%, 0.968); and for IMPACT (lab), it was >41 (82%, 100%, 0.954). There were statistical differences among TRISS, CRASH (at 14 days and 6 months), and IMPACT (core, extended, lab) in terms of area under the ROC curve ( < 0.0001).

Conclusion: IMPACT (core, extended) models were the strongest predictors of mortality in moderate-to-severe TBI when compared with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT (lab) models.

Citing Articles

Hypotension and Adverse Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lee J, Wang W, Rezk A, Mohammed A, Macabudbud K, Englesakis M JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(11):e2444465.

PMID: 39527054 PMC: 11555550. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44465.


Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score as a Mortality Predictor in Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Huang C, Yen Y, Tsai C, Hsu S, Tsai P, Hsieh C Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201238 PMC: 11353928. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161680.


Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective analysis.

Wang H, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Liu Y Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(10):4931-4956.

PMID: 38722502 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07572-y.


Long-term health-related quality of life after trauma with and without traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study.

Kiwanuka O, Lassaren P, Thelin E, Hanell A, Sandblom G, Fagerdahl A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2986.

PMID: 36805021 PMC: 9941121. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30082-4.


Prediction of Mortality in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Wang R, Zeng X, Long Y, Zhang J, Bo H, He M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36672075 PMC: 9857144. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010094.

References
1.
Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S . Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ. 2008; 336(7641):425-9. PMC: 2249681. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39461.643438.25. View

2.
Maeda Y, Ichikawa R, Misawa J, Shibuya A, Hishiki T, Maeda T . External validation of the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury in Japan. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221791. PMC: 6709937. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221791. View

3.
Hukkelhoven C, Rampen A, Maas A, Farace E, Habbema J, Marmarou A . Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not valid. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(2):132-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.009. View

4.
Steyerberg E, Moons K, van der Windt D, Hayden J, Perel P, Schroter S . Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(2):e1001381. PMC: 3564751. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381. View

5.
Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I . Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006; 6:38. PMC: 1657003. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-38. View