» Articles » PMID: 34659816

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognostic Value of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Patients with PT1a and PT1b Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma After Surgical Resection

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2021 Oct 18
PMID 34659816
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in different subgroups of lung adenocarcinoma, but there remains controversial on this issue. We conduct this study aimed to reveal the prognostic value of EGFR mutation in patients with pT1a and pT1b invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods: From August 2009 to February 2015, 338 patients with pT1a and pT1b invasive lung adenocarcinoma who underwent EGFR mutation analysis were enrolled into this study. According to clinicopathologic and radiologic characteristics, survival analysis was conducted in different subgroups using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models.

Results: EGFR mutation was detected in 216 (63.9%) patients. In the entire cohort, EGFR mutation was significantly frequent in female (P=0.011), never smoking (P=0.014) patients, patients with part-solid nodules (P=0.005) and patients with lepidic pattern-predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA)/acinar pattern-predominant adenocarcinoma (APA)/papillary pattern-predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA) (P=0.005). No difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) was seen between patients harboring EGFR mutation and patients without EGFR mutation in the entire cohort (P=0.664) and the subgroup cohorts. Patients with EGFR mutation had a longer overall survival (OS) compared with patients without EGFR mutation in the entire cohort (P=0.005) and the subgroups of N0 stage cohort (P=0.013), N1-2 stage cohort (P=0.033), APA/PPA/invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) cohort (P=0.011) and pT1b cohort (P=0.002). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could significantly prolong the OS in patients with EGFR mutation after recurrence (P=0.04).

Conclusions: EGFR mutation was not a risk factor for recurrence of patients with pT1a and pT1b invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Citing Articles

Resected -mutated non-small-cell lung cancers: incidence and outcomes in a European population (GFPC Exerpos Study).

Auliac J, Thomas P, Bylicki O, Guisier F, Curcio H, AlainVegnenegre Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241236451.

PMID: 38455711 PMC: 10919127. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241236451.


Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers in Resected Early-Stage Non-Small Cells Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Gallina F, Bertolaccini L, Forcella D, Mohamed S, Ceddia S, Melis E Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35454856 PMC: 9024905. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081949.

References
1.
Fu F, Zhang Y, Wen Z, Zheng D, Gao Z, Han H . Distinct Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiologic Part-Solid or Solid Lesions. J Thorac Oncol. 2019; 14(12):2133-2142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.002. View

2.
Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S . Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(11):2513-20. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.992. View

3.
DAngelo S, Janjigian Y, Ahye N, Riely G, Chaft J, Sima C . Distinct clinical course of EGFR-mutant resected lung cancers: results of testing of 1118 surgical specimens and effects of adjuvant gefitinib and erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7(12):1815-1822. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826bb7b2. View

4.
Ito M, Miyata Y, Kushitani K, Yoshiya T, Kai Y, Tsutani Y . Increased risk of recurrence in resected EGFR-positive pN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Thorac Cancer. 2018; 9(12):1594-1602. PMC: 6275825. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12866. View

5.
Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T . Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(24):8919-23. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2818. View