» Articles » PMID: 34656637

Coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 in Sewerage and Their Removal: Step by Step in Wastewater Treatment Plants

Overview
Journal Environ Res
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Oct 17
PMID 34656637
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The fate of Coronaviruses (CoVs) and in particular SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has not been completely understood yet, but an adequate knowledge on the removal performances in WWTPs could help to prevent waterborne transmission of the virus that is still under debate. CoVs and SARS-CoV-2 are discharged from faeces into the sewer network and reach WWTPs within a few hours. This review presents the fate of SARS-CoV-2 and other CoVs in the primary, secondary and tertiary treatments of WWTPs as well as in sludge treatments. The viral loads decrease progressively along with the treatments from 20 to 3.0E+06 GU/L (Genomic Units/L) in the influent wastewater to concentrations below 2.50E+05 GU/L after secondary biological treatments and finally to negative concentrations (below detection limit) in disinfected effluents. Reduction of CoVs is due to (i) natural decay under unfavourable conditions (solids, microorganisms, temperature) for relatively long hydraulic retention times and (ii) processes of sedimentation, filtration, predation, adsorption, disinfection. In primary and secondary settling, due to the hydrophobic properties, a partial accumulation of CoVs may occur in the separated sludge. In secondary treatment (i.e. activated sludge) CoVs and SARS-CoV-2 loads can be reduced only by about one logarithm (∼90%). To enhance this removal, tertiary treatment with ultrafiltration (Membrane Bioreactors) and chemical disinfection or UV light is needed. CoVs and SARS-CoV-2 in the sludge (1.2E+04-4.6E+08 GU/L) can be inactivated significantly in the thermophilic digestion (55 °C), while mesophilic temperatures (33-37 °C) are not efficient. Additional studies are required to investigate the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in WWTPs, especially in view of increasing interest in wastewater reclamation and reuse.

Citing Articles

Variations in the persistence of 5'-end genomic and subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 RNAs in wastewater from aircraft, airports and wastewater treatment plants.

Tang M, Bennedbaek M, Gunalan V, Qvesel A, Thorsen T, Larsen N Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e29703.

PMID: 38694057 PMC: 11061675. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29703.


Identifying spatiotemporal trends of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater: from the perspective of upstream and downstream wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE).

Phuc-Hanh Tran D, You B, Liu C, Chen Y, Wang Y, Chung S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024; 31(8):11576-11590.

PMID: 38221556 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-31769-x.


Rapid assays of SARS-CoV-2 virus and noble biosensors by nanomaterials.

Liu Y, Li Y, Hang Y, Wang L, Wang J, Bao N Nano Converg. 2024; 11(1):2.

PMID: 38190075 PMC: 10774473. DOI: 10.1186/s40580-023-00408-z.


Review of concerned SARS-CoV-2 variants like Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529), as well as novel methods for reducing and inactivating SARS-CoV-2 mutants in wastewater treatment facilities.

Zahmatkesh S, Sillanpaa M, Rezakhani Y, Wang C J Hazard Mater Adv. 2023; 7:100140.

PMID: 37520798 PMC: 9349052. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100140.


SARS-CoV-2 in the environment: Contamination routes, detection methods, persistence and removal in wastewater treatment plants.

Atoui A, Cordevant C, Chesnot T, Gassilloud B Sci Total Environ. 2023; 881:163453.

PMID: 37059142 PMC: 10091716. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163453.


References
1.
Rabaan A, Al-Ahmed S, Haque S, Sah R, Tiwari R, Singh Malik Y . SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-COV: A comparative overview. Infez Med. 2020; 28(2):174-184. View

2.
Carraturo F, Del Giudice C, Morelli M, Cerullo V, Libralato G, Galdiero E . Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in the environment and COVID-19 transmission risk from environmental matrices and surfaces. Environ Pollut. 2020; 265(Pt B):115010. PMC: 7280109. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115010. View

3.
Haramoto E, Kitajima M, Hata A, Torrey J, Masago Y, Sano D . A review on recent progress in the detection methods and prevalence of human enteric viruses in water. Water Res. 2018; 135:168-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.004. View

4.
Westhaus S, Weber F, Schiwy S, Linnemann V, Brinkmann M, Widera M . Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater in Germany - Suitability for COVID-19 surveillance and potential transmission risks. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 751:141750. PMC: 7434407. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141750. View

5.
Simmons F, Xagoraraki I . Release of infectious human enteric viruses by full-scale wastewater utilities. Water Res. 2011; 45(12):3590-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.001. View