» Articles » PMID: 34655331

Cardiovascular Responses to Dynamic and Static Upper-body Exercise in a Cold Environment in Coronary Artery Disease Patients

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2021 Oct 16
PMID 34655331
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Upper-body exercise performed in a cold environment may increase cardiovascular strain, which could be detrimental to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study compared cardiovascular responses of CAD patients during graded upper-body dynamic and static exercise in cold and neutral environments.

Methods: 20 patients with stable CAD performed 30 min of progressive dynamic (light, moderate, and heavy rating of perceived exertion) and static (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction) upper body exercise in cold (- 15 °C) and neutral (+ 22 °C) environments. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and electrocardiographic (ECG) responses were recorded and rate pressure product (RPP) calculated.

Results: Dynamic-graded upper-body exercise in the cold increased HR by 2.3-4.8% (p = 0.002-0.040), MAP by 3.9-5.9% (p = 0.038-0.454) and RPP by 18.1-24.4% (p = 0.002-0.020) when compared to the neutral environment. Static graded upper-body exercise in the cold resulted in higher MAP (6.3-9.1%; p = 0.000-0.014), lower HR (4.1-7.2%; p = 0.009-0.033), but unaltered RPP compared to a neutral environment. Heavy dynamic exercise resulted in ST depression that was not related to temperature. Otherwise, ECG was largely unaltered during exercise in either thermal condition.

Conclusions: Dynamic- and static-graded upper-body exercise in the cold involves higher cardiovascular strain compared with a neutral environment among patients with stable CAD. However, no marked changes in electric cardiac function were observed. The results support the use of upper-body exercise in the cold in patients with stable CAD.

Trial Registration: Clinical trial registration NCT02855905 August 2016.

Citing Articles

Baroreflex sensitivity following acute upper-body exercise in the cold among stable coronary artery disease patients.

Pikkarainen K, Valtonen R, Hintsala H, Kiviniemi A, Crandall C, Perkiomaki J Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1184378.

PMID: 37900953 PMC: 10611474. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1184378.

References
1.
Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson D, Zwisler A, Rees K, Martin N . Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. View

2.
Aslam A, Aslam A, Vasavada B, Khan I . Hypothermia: evaluation, electrocardiographic manifestations, and management. Am J Med. 2006; 119(4):297-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.062. View

3.
Calbet J, Gonzalez-Alonso J, Helge J, Sondergaard H, Munch-Andersen T, Saltin B . Central and peripheral hemodynamics in exercising humans: leg vs arm exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015; 25 Suppl 4:144-57. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12604. View

4.
Castellani J, Young A . Human physiological responses to cold exposure: Acute responses and acclimatization to prolonged exposure. Auton Neurosci. 2016; 196:63-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.02.009. View

5.
Greaney J, Stanhewicz A, Kenney W, Alexander L . Muscle sympathetic nerve activity during cold stress and isometric exercise in healthy older adults. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014; 117(6):648-57. PMC: 4157163. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00516.2014. View