» Articles » PMID: 34654804

Dynamics of History-dependent Perceptual Judgment

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Oct 16
PMID 34654804
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identical physical inputs do not always evoke identical percepts. To investigate the role of stimulus history in tactile perception, we designed a task in which rats had to judge each vibrissal vibration, in a long series, as strong or weak depending on its mean speed. After a low-speed stimulus (trial n - 1), rats were more likely to report the next stimulus (trial n) as strong, and after a high-speed stimulus, they were more likely to report the next stimulus as weak, a repulsive effect that did not depend on choice or reward on trial n - 1. This effect could be tracked over several preceding trials (i.e., n - 2 and earlier) and was characterized by an exponential decay function, reflecting a trial-by-trial incorporation of sensory history. Surprisingly, the influence of trial n - 1 strengthened as the time interval between n - 1 and n grew. Human subjects receiving fingertip vibrations showed these same key findings. We are able to account for the repulsive stimulus history effect, and its detailed time scale, through a single-parameter model, wherein each new stimulus gradually updates the subject's decision criterion. This model points to mechanisms underlying how the past affects the ongoing subjective experience.

Citing Articles

Opposing serial effects of stimulus and choice in speech perception scale with context variability.

Ufer C, Blank H iScience. 2024; 27(9):110611.

PMID: 39252961 PMC: 11382034. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110611.


Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.

Ramamurthy D, Rodriguez L, Cen C, Li S, Chen A, Feldman D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131281 PMC: 11312476. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.17.603927.


Location- and feature-based selection histories make independent, qualitatively distinct contributions to urgent visuomotor performance.

Oor E, Salinas E, Stanford T bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38853897 PMC: 11160778. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.29.596532.


Localized and global representation of prior value, sensory evidence, and choice in male mouse cerebral cortex.

Ishizu K, Nishimoto S, Ueoka Y, Funamizu A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4071.

PMID: 38778078 PMC: 11111702. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48338-6.


Unifying network model links recency and central tendency biases in working memory.

Boboeva V, Pezzotta A, Clopath C, Akrami A Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38656279 PMC: 11042808. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.86725.


References
1.
Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A . Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science. 1996; 273(5283):1868-71. DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5283.1868. View

2.
Azouz R, Gray C . Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(6):2209-23. PMC: 6782570. View

3.
Carandini M . Amplification of trial-to-trial response variability by neurons in visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(9):E264. PMC: 509408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020264. View

4.
Monto S, Palva S, Voipio J, Palva J . Very slow EEG fluctuations predict the dynamics of stimulus detection and oscillation amplitudes in humans. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(33):8268-72. PMC: 6670577. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1910-08.2008. View

5.
Faisal A, Selen L, Wolpert D . Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9(4):292-303. PMC: 2631351. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2258. View