» Articles » PMID: 34653497

Behavioral and Neural Representations En Route to Intuitive Action Understanding

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2021 Oct 15
PMID 34653497
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When we observe another person's actions, we process many kinds of information - from how their body moves to the intention behind their movements. What kinds of information underlie our intuitive understanding about how similar actions are to each other? To address this question, we measured the intuitive similarities among a large set of everyday action videos using multi-arrangement experiments, then used a modeling approach to predict this intuitive similarity space along three hypothesized properties. We found that similarity in the actors' inferred goals predicted the intuitive similarity judgments the best, followed by similarity in the actors' movements, with little contribution from the videos' visual appearance. In opportunistic fMRI analyses assessing brain-behavior correlations, we found suggestive evidence for an action processing hierarchy, in which these three kinds of action similarities are reflected in the structure of brain responses along a posterior-to-anterior gradient on the lateral surface of the visual cortex. Altogether, this work joins existing literature suggesting that humans are naturally tuned to process others' intentions, and that the visuo-motor cortex computes the perceptual precursors of the higher-level representations over which intuitive action perception operates.

Citing Articles

Cortical Encoding of Spatial Structure and Semantic Content in 3D Natural Scenes.

Mononen R, Saarela T, Vallinoja J, Olkkonen M, Henriksson L J Neurosci. 2025; 45(9).

PMID: 39788741 PMC: 11866997. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2157-23.2024.


Color and Spatial Frequency Provide Functional Signatures of Retinotopic Visual Areas.

Loggia S, Duffield S, Braunlich K, Conway B J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39496489 PMC: 11714348. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-23.2024.


Contrastive learning explains the emergence and function of visual category-selective regions.

Prince J, Alvarez G, Konkle T Sci Adv. 2024; 10(39):eadl1776.

PMID: 39321304 PMC: 11423896. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl1776.


Sensitivity and specificity of the action observation network to kinematics, target object, and gesture meaning.

Simonelli F, Handjaras G, Benuzzi F, Bernardi G, Leo A, Duzzi D Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(11):e26762.

PMID: 39037079 PMC: 11261593. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26762.


Overlapping representations of observed actions and action-related features.

Kabulska Z, Zhuang T, Lingnau A Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(3):e26605.

PMID: 38379447 PMC: 10879913. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26605.


References
1.
Fischer J, Mikhael J, Tenenbaum J, Kanwisher N . Functional neuroanatomy of intuitive physical inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(34):E5072-81. PMC: 5003259. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610344113. View

2.
Oliva A, Torralba A . Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 155:23-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55002-2. View

3.
Lingnau A, Petris S . Action understanding within and outside the motor system: the role of task difficulty. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(6):1342-50. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs112. View

4.
Saxe R, Xiao D, Kovacs G, Perrett D, Kanwisher N . A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(11):1435-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.015. View

5.
Spunt R, Satpute A, Lieberman M . Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: an fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(1):63-74. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21446. View