» Articles » PMID: 34650092

Interindividual Differences in Environmentally Relevant Positive Trait Affect Impacts Sustainable Behavior in Everyday Life

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Oct 15
PMID 34650092
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emotions are powerful drivers of human behavior that may make people aware of the urgency to act to mitigate climate change and provide a motivational basis to engage in sustainable action. However, attempts to leverage emotions via climate communications have yielded unsatisfactory results, with many interventions failing to produce the desired behaviors. It is important to understand the underlying affective mechanisms when designing communications, rather than treating emotions as simple behavioral levers that directly impact behavior. Across two field experiments, we show that individual predispositions to experience positive emotions in an environmental context (trait affect) predict pro-environmental actions and corresponding shifts in affective states (towards personal as well as witnessed pro-environmental actions). Moreover, trait affect predicts the individual behavioral impact of positively valenced emotion-based intervention strategies from environmental messages. These findings have important implications for the targeted design of affect-based interventions aiming to promote sustainable behavior and may be of interest within other domains that utilize similar intervention strategies (e.g., within the health domain).

Citing Articles

Emotional design for pro-environmental life: Visual appeal and user interactivity influence sustainable consumption intention with moderating effect of positive emotion.

Feng Y, Zhao L Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38521.

PMID: 39398056 PMC: 11471219. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38521.


The International Climate Psychology Collaboration: Climate change-related data collected from 63 countries.

Doell K, Todorova B, Vlasceanu M, Bak Coleman J, Pronizius E, Schumann P Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1066.

PMID: 39353944 PMC: 11445540. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03865-1.


Uncovering the potential of evaluative conditioning in shaping attitudes toward sustainable product packaging.

Leeuwis N, van Bommel T, Tsakiris M, Alimardani M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1284422.

PMID: 38550644 PMC: 10977460. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284422.


Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries.

Vlasceanu M, Doell K, Bak-Coleman J, Todorova B, Berkebile-Weinberg M, Grayson S Sci Adv. 2024; 10(6):eadj5778.

PMID: 38324680 PMC: 10849597. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778.


Systems Thinking in an era of climate change: Does cognitive neuroscience hold the key to improving environmental decision making? A perspective on Climate-Smart Agriculture.

Lalani B, Gray S, Mitra-Ganguli T Front Integr Neurosci. 2023; 17:1145744.

PMID: 37181865 PMC: 10174047. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1145744.


References
1.
Lerner J, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam K . Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:799-823. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043. View

2.
Smith N, Leiserowitz A . The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal. 2013; 34(5):937-48. PMC: 4298023. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12140. View

3.
Schneider C, Zaval L, Weber E, Markowitz E . The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on pro-environmental decision making. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0188781. PMC: 5708744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188781. View

4.
Kraft P, Rise J, Sutton S, Roysamb E . Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005; 44(Pt 3):479-96. DOI: 10.1348/014466604X17533. View

5.
Trull T, Ebner-Priemer U . The Role of Ambulatory Assessment in Psychological Science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 23(6):466-470. PMC: 4269226. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414550706. View