» Articles » PMID: 34650017

Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Bacteria After Glide Path Preparation Between Manual K File, One G Rotary, and WaveOne Gold Glider Reciprocation Preparations

Overview
Journal Eur Endod J
Publisher Kare Publishing
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Oct 15
PMID 34650017
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the amount of apically extruded bacteria between hand-filed preparations, rotary and reciprocation glide path preparations in curved canals of extracted teeth infected with Enterococcus faecalis.

Methods: Forty mandibular first molar teeth were decoronated, fitted into rubber stoppers and fixed onto glass vials. The mesiobuccal canals from mandibular first molar teeth were infected with Enterococcus faecalis, then randomly assigned to one of five groups for glide path preparation: manual stainless-steel file (K-files), rotary file (One G), reciprocating file (WaveOne Gold Glider) and two control groups. After glide path preparation, 0.01 mL of saline was taken from the experimental vials. The solution was plated on tryptic soy agar and colonies of bacteria were counted as colony-forming units. The results were analysed statistically using Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The manual K-file group was associated with significantly more bacteria extrusion compared to the rotary and reciprocating groups (P<0.05). However, no significant difference occurred between rotary and reciprocation instruments.

Conclusion: All instrumentation techniques resulted in a measurable amount of apical extrusion of bacteria. Manual K-files extruded the highest quantity of bacteria compared to One G rotary file and WaveOne Gold Glider reciprocation file during glide path preparation.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time by Traverse, R-Motion Glider C, and Other Glide Path Systems in Severely Curved Canals.

Al Omari T, Hassouneh L, Albashaireh K, Dkmak A, Albanna R, Al-Mohammed A Int J Dent. 2025; 2025:6619901.

PMID: 40041725 PMC: 11879535. DOI: 10.1155/ijod/6619901.


Glide Path in Endodontics: A Literature Review of Current Knowledge.

Lup V, Malvicini G, Gaeta C, Grandini S, Ciavoi G Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195101 PMC: 11352993. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080257.

References
1.
Alves F, Paiva P, Marceliano-Alves M, Cabreira L, Lima K, Siqueira Jr J . Bacteria and Hard Tissue Debris Extrusion and Intracanal Bacterial Reduction Promoted by XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc Instruments. J Endod. 2018; 44(7):1173-1178. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.007. View

2.
Beeson T, Hartwell G, Thornton J, Gunsolley J . Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29. J Endod. 1998; 24(1):18-22. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80206-9. View

3.
Tanalp J, Gungor T . Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2013; 47(3):211-21. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12137. View

4.
Ahn S, Kim H, Kim E . Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod. 2016; 42(7):1009-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002. View

5.
Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M . Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine against bacteria in biofilms at different stages of development. J Endod. 2011; 37(5):657-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.007. View