» Articles » PMID: 34649545

Quality of Life and Complications in Elderly Patients After Pronation Rotation Type III Ankle Fractures Treated with a Cast and Early Weight-bearing

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Oct 15
PMID 34649545
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early weight-bearing is becoming increasingly common because it can positively affect the quality of life of patients. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of this conservative treatment should be assessed for different types of ankle fractures. The goal of this study was to compare early weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing in terms of effectiveness and safety in patients with pronation rotation type III ankle fractures treated nonsurgically.

Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted over two years. Elderly patients with a nondisplaced pronation rotation type III ankle fracture were included. The main variables were the Barthel Index and SF-12 scores. The patients completed the questionnaires at six weeks, one year and two years. We also compared the complications associated with the two interventions.

Results: 30 patients were included in the weight-bearing group, while 32 patients were included in the non-weight-bearing (WB) group. The mean ages were 82.6 ± 2.6 years and 83.1 ± 2.6 years, respectively. Quality of life, measured with the SF-12 scale, increased significantly in both the short and long term in the WB group (53.5 ± 5.8 points vs 65.2 ± 4.4 points at 6 weeks and 70.1 ± 4.2 points vs. 80.9 ± 3.7 points at 2 years; p<0.001). The WB group also showed a higher quality of life, as measured by the Barthel Index (54.5 ± 5.2 points vs. 64.3 ± 4.0 points at 6 weeks and 71.0 ± 4.3 points vs. 80.7 ± 3.4 points at 2 years; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Elderly patients with pronation rotation type III fractures could benefit from an early weight-bearing protocol in terms of quality of life and functionality.

Citing Articles

Weight-Bearing Versus Non-Weight-Bearing After Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome.

Llombart-Blanco R, Mariscal G, Khalil I, Cordon V, Benlloch M, Barrios C Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003723 PMC: 11857458. DOI: 10.3390/life15020314.


The effect of early weight-bearing and later weight-bearing rehabilitation interventions on outcomes after ankle fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Chen B, Ye Z, Wu J, Wang G, Yu T J Foot Ankle Res. 2024; 17(2):e12011.

PMID: 38635458 PMC: 11080868. DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12011.


Ankle fractures of the geriatric patient: a narrative review.

Ziegler P, Bahrs C, Konrads C, Hemmann P, Ahrend M EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(1):1-10.

PMID: 36705613 PMC: 9969005. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0082.

References
1.
MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

2.
Baker C, Moore-Lotridge S, Hysong A, Posey S, Robinette J, Blum D . Bone Fracture Acute Phase Response-A Unifying Theory of Fracture Repair: Clinical and Scientific Implications. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2019; 16(4):142-158. PMC: 6404386. DOI: 10.1007/s12018-018-9256-x. View

3.
Costigan W, Thordarson D, Debnath U . Operative management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(1):32-7. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0006. View

4.
Davies C, Rutherford I, Thomas D . Electrically evoked contractions of the triceps surae during and following 21 days of voluntary leg immobilization. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987; 56(3):306-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00690897. View

5.
Busija L, Pausenberger E, Haines T, Haymes S, Buchbinder R, Osborne R . Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes.... Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 63 Suppl 11:S383-412. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20541. View