» Articles » PMID: 34645418

Fair Prioritization of Casualties in Disaster Triage: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2021 Oct 14
PMID 34645418
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Disasters may result in mass casualties and an imbalance between health care demands and supplies. This imbalance necessitates the prioritization of the victims based on the severity of their condition. Contributing factors and their effect on decision-making is a challenging issue in disaster triage. The present study seeks to address criteria for ethical decision-making in the prioritization of patients in disaster triage.

Methods: This conventional content analysis study was conducted in 2017. Subjects were selected from among Iranian experts using purposeful and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and were analyzed by the content analysis.

Results: Efficient and effective triage and priority-oriented triage were the main categories. These categories summarized a number of medical and nonmedical factors that should be considered in the prioritization of the victims in disaster triage.

Conclusion: A combination of measures should be considered to maximize the benefits of the prioritization of causalities in disasters. None of these measures alone would suffice to explain all aspects of ethical decision-making in disaster triage. Further investigations are needed to elaborate on these criteria in decision-making.

Citing Articles

Challenges of providing of special care services in hospitals during emergencies and disasters: a scoping review.

Masbi M, Tavakoli N, Dowlati M BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):238.

PMID: 39695959 PMC: 11657394. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01160-1.


Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit.

Olofinbiyi O, Makhado L Nurs Res Pract. 2024; 2024:8621065.

PMID: 39493891 PMC: 11530285. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8621065.


Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 triage protocols to access critical care: a scoping review.

Ramirez C, Farmer Y, Bouthillier M Discov Health Syst. 2023; 2(1):16.

PMID: 37206881 PMC: 10169297. DOI: 10.1007/s44250-023-00027-9.

References
1.
Kuschner W, Pollard J, Ezeji-Okoye S . Ethical triage and scarce resource allocation during public health emergencies: tenets and procedures. Hosp Top. 2007; 85(3):16-25. DOI: 10.3200/HTPS.85.3.16-25. View

2.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

3.
Khankeh H, Nakhaei M, Masoumi G, Hosseini M, Parsa-Yekta Z, Kurland L . Life recovery after disasters: a qualitative study in the Iranian context. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013; 28(6):573-9. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1300900X. View

4.
Caro J, DeRenzo E, Coleman C, Weinstock D, Knebel A . Resource allocation after a nuclear detonation incident: unaltered standards of ethical decision making. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011; 5 Suppl 1:S46-53. DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2011.14. View

5.
Caro J, Coleman C, Knebel A, DeRenzo E . Unaltered ethical standards for individual physicians in the face of drastically reduced resources resulting from an improvised nuclear device event. J Clin Ethics. 2011; 22(1):33-41. View