» Articles » PMID: 34640444

Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor with Backup Laparoscopic Surgery: Description of a Single-Center Experience

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Oct 13
PMID 34640444
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with a high probability of surgical intervention. Between January 2013 and January 2021, 83 patients underwent ER at the operation theater and 27 patients (32.5%) required backup surgery mainly due to incidental perforation or uncontrolled bleeding despite endoscopic repairing. The tumor was predominantly located in the upper-third stomach (81%) with a size ≤ 2 cm (69.9%) and deep to the muscularis propria (MP) layer (92.8%) but there were no significant differences between two groups except tumor exophytic growth as a risk factor in the surgery group (37% vs. 0%, < 0.0001). Patients in the ER-only group had shorter durations of procedure times (60 min vs. 185 min, < 0.0001) and lengths of stay (5 days vs. 7 days, < 0.0001) but with a higher percentage of overall morbidity graded III (0% vs. 7.1%, = 0.1571). After ER, five patients (6%) had delayed perforation and two (2.4%) required emergent laparoscopic surgery. Neither recurrence nor gastric stenosis was reported during long-term surveillance. Here, we provide a minimally invasive strategy of endoscopic resection with backup laparoscopic surgery for gastric SETs.

Citing Articles

Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors.

Chang W, Tsao L, Yen H, Yang C, Chang H, Kor C World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(8):1629-1640.

PMID: 37701681 PMC: 10494604. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1629.


Retraction: Comparing the controlled attenuation parameter using FibroScan and attenuation imaging with ultrasound as a novel measurement for liver steatosis.

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273606.

PMID: 35994470 PMC: 9394796. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273606.

References
1.
Yen H, Wu P, Chen M, Lin W, Tsai C, Lin K . Current Status and Future Perspective of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Review of Recent Literature. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(16). PMC: 8397124. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163527. View

2.
Chun S, Kim K, Park D, Lee I, Park J, Moon S . Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(9):3271-9. PMC: 3751271. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2904-9. View

3.
Kim H . Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Advantages and hurdles. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 7(3):192-205. PMC: 4360437. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.192. View

4.
Zhu L, Khan S, Hui Y, Zhao J, Li B, Ma S . Treatment recommendations for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: positive endoscopic resection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019; 54(3):297-302. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1578405. View

5.
Lamm S, Steinemann D, Linke G, Eucker D, Simon T, Zerz A . Total inverse transgastric resection with transoral specimen removal. Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(11):3363-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4037-1. View