Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor with Backup Laparoscopic Surgery: Description of a Single-Center Experience
Overview
Affiliations
The aim of this study was to analyze patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with a high probability of surgical intervention. Between January 2013 and January 2021, 83 patients underwent ER at the operation theater and 27 patients (32.5%) required backup surgery mainly due to incidental perforation or uncontrolled bleeding despite endoscopic repairing. The tumor was predominantly located in the upper-third stomach (81%) with a size ≤ 2 cm (69.9%) and deep to the muscularis propria (MP) layer (92.8%) but there were no significant differences between two groups except tumor exophytic growth as a risk factor in the surgery group (37% vs. 0%, < 0.0001). Patients in the ER-only group had shorter durations of procedure times (60 min vs. 185 min, < 0.0001) and lengths of stay (5 days vs. 7 days, < 0.0001) but with a higher percentage of overall morbidity graded III (0% vs. 7.1%, = 0.1571). After ER, five patients (6%) had delayed perforation and two (2.4%) required emergent laparoscopic surgery. Neither recurrence nor gastric stenosis was reported during long-term surveillance. Here, we provide a minimally invasive strategy of endoscopic resection with backup laparoscopic surgery for gastric SETs.
Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors.
Chang W, Tsao L, Yen H, Yang C, Chang H, Kor C World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(8):1629-1640.
PMID: 37701681 PMC: 10494604. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1629.
PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0273606.
PMID: 35994470 PMC: 9394796. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273606.