» Articles » PMID: 34638798

Bacterial Luciferases from and Demonstrate Different Conformational Stability As Detected by Time-Resolved Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Oct 13
PMID 34638798
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Detecting the folding/unfolding pathways of biological macromolecules is one of the urgent problems of molecular biophysics. The unfolding of bacterial luciferase from is well-studied, unlike that of , despite the fact that both of them are actively used as a reporter system. The aim of this study was to compare the conformational transitions of these luciferases from two different protein subfamilies during equilibrium unfolding with urea. Intrinsic steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectra and circular dichroism spectra were used to determine the stages of the protein unfolding. Molecular dynamics methods were applied to find the differences in the surroundings of tryptophans in both luciferases. We found that the unfolding pathway is the same for the studied luciferases. However, the results obtained indicate more stable tertiary and secondary structures of luciferase as compared to enzyme from during the last stage of denaturation, including the unfolding of individual subunits. The distinctions in fluorescence of the two proteins are associated with differences in the structure of the C-terminal domain of α-subunits, which causes different quenching of tryptophan emissions. The time-resolved fluorescence technique proved to be a more effective method for studying protein unfolding than steady-state methods.

Citing Articles

The Role of Cosolvent-Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Luciferase.

Lisitsa A, Sukovatyi L, Deeva A, Gulnov D, Esimbekova E, Kratasyuk V Life (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37374166 PMC: 10301326. DOI: 10.3390/life13061384.


Enzyme Inhibition-Based Assay to Estimate the Contribution of Formulants to the Effect of Commercial Pesticide Formulations.

Esimbekova E, Kalyabina V, Kopylova K, Lonshakova-Mukina V, Antashkevich A, Torgashina I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(3).

PMID: 36768591 PMC: 9916951. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032268.


Structure-Function Relationships in Temperature Effects on Bacterial Luciferases: Nothing Is Perfect.

Deeva A, Lisitsa A, Sukovatyi L, Melnik T, Kratasyuk V, Nemtseva E Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(15).

PMID: 35897698 PMC: 9332260. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158119.

References
1.
van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark A, Berendsen H . GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005; 26(16):1701-18. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20291. View

2.
Ghisaidoobe A, Chung S . Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence in the detection and analysis of proteins: a focus on Förster resonance energy transfer techniques. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15(12):22518-38. PMC: 4284722. DOI: 10.3390/ijms151222518. View

3.
Thoden J, Holden H, Fisher A, Sinclair J, Wesenberg G, Baldwin T . Structure of the beta 2 homodimer of bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi: X-ray analysis of a kinetic protein folding trap. Protein Sci. 1997; 6(1):13-23. PMC: 2143504. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060103. View

4.
Inlow J, Baldwin T . Mutational analysis of the subunit interface of Vibrio harveyi bacterial luciferase. Biochemistry. 2002; 41(12):3906-15. DOI: 10.1021/bi012113g. View

5.
Baldwin T, ZIEGLER M, Green V, Thomas M . Overexpression of bacterial luciferase and purification from recombinant sources. Methods Enzymol. 2000; 305:135-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)05483-5. View