» Articles » PMID: 34635186

The Diagnostic Indicators of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus from Second Trimester to Birth: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 Oct 12
PMID 34635186
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance first recognised during pregnancy. Both modalities and thresholds of the GDM diagnostic test, the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), have varied widely over time and among countries. Additionally, OGTT limitations include inconsistency, poor patient tolerability, and questionable diagnostic reliability. Many biological parameters have been reported to be modified by GDM and could potentially be used as diagnostic indicators. This study aimed to 1) systematically explore biomarkers reported in the literature as differentiating GDM from healthy pregnancies 2) screen those indicators assessed against OGTT to propose OGTT alternatives.

Main Body: A systematic review of GDM diagnostic indicators was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42020145499). Inclusion criteria were full-text, comprehensible English-language articles published January 2009-January 2021, where a biomarker (from blood, ultrasound, amniotic fluid, placenta) was compared between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) women from the second trimester onward to immediately postpartum. GDM diagnostic method had to be clearly specified, and the number of patients per study higher than 30 in total or 15 per group. Results were synthesised by biomarkers.

Results: Of 13,133 studies identified in initial screening, 174 studies (135,801 participants) were included. One hundred and twenty-nine studies described blood analytes, one amniotic fluid analytes, 27 ultrasound features, 17 post-natal features. Among the biomarkers evaluated in exploratory studies, Adiponectin, AFABP, Betatrophin, CRP, Cystatin-C, Delta-Neutrophil Index, GGT, TNF-A were those demonstrating statistically and clinically significant differences in substantial cohorts of patients (> 500). Regarding biomarkers assessed versus OGTT (i.e. potential OGTT alternatives) most promising were Leptin > 48.5 ng/ml, Ficolin3/adiponectin ratio ≥ 1.06, Chemerin/FABP > 0.71, and Ultrasound Gestational Diabetes Score > 4. These all demonstrated sensitivity and specificity > 80% in adequate sample sizes (> / = 100).

Conclusions: Numerous biomarkers may differentiate GDM from normoglycaemic pregnancy. Given the limitations of the OGTT and the lack of a gold standard for GDM diagnosis, advanced phase studies are needed to triangulate the most promising biomarkers. Further studies are also recommended to assess the sensitivity and specificity of promising biomarkers not yet assessed against OGTT.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020145499.

Citing Articles

Immune changes in pregnancy: associations with pre-existing conditions and obstetrical complications at the 20th gestational week-a prospective cohort study.

Westergaard D, Lundgaard A, Vomstein K, Fich L, Hviid K, Egerup P BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):583.

PMID: 39696496 PMC: 11657209. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03797-y.


Sex hormone-binding globulin is a valuable diagnostic indicator of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Bruno B, Blessing M, Izuchukwu M, Terry G, Faeren D Ghana Med J. 2024; 58(1):53-59.

PMID: 38957276 PMC: 11215231. DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.8.


Ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal hemodynamic parameters in pregnant women with diabetes mellitus in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Cai D, Yan S Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e30352.

PMID: 38868048 PMC: 11167258. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30352.


Demand and Requirements for a Digital Healthcare System to Manage Gestational Diabetes in Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Yu J, Kim O, Kang B, Lee S, Lee Y, Hwang H Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241252569.

PMID: 38756007 PMC: 11100378. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241252569.


Serum proteins differentially expressed in gestational diabetes mellitus assessed using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation proteomics.

Cao W, Yu C, Zhang L World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(8):1395-1405.

PMID: 38576811 PMC: 10989458. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i8.1395.


References
1.
Zhao W, Pan J, Li H, Huang Y, Liu F, Tao M . Relationship between High Serum Cystatin C Levels and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0147277. PMC: 4743926. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147277. View

2.
Erol O, Ellidag H, Ayik H, Ozel M, Uysal Derbent A, Yilmaz N . Evaluation of circulating betatrophin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31(8):652-6. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1056142. View

3.
Afkhami-Ardekani M, Rashidi M . Iron status in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2008; 23(3):194-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.11.006. View

4.
Ilhan G, Gultekin H, Kubat A, Gokmen Karasu A, Gungor E, Zebitay G . Preliminary evaluation of foetal liver volume by three-dimensional ultrasound in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38(7):922-926. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1434136. View

5.
. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with neonatal anthropometrics. Diabetes. 2008; 58(2):453-9. PMC: 2628620. DOI: 10.2337/db08-1112. View