» Articles » PMID: 34634579

Comorbidity Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life in Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment

Overview
Journal Sex Med
Date 2021 Oct 11
PMID 34634579
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Studies have demonstrated worse health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in gay and bisexual men (GBM) following prostate cancer treatment compared to heterosexual men potentially due to differences in comorbidity burden.

Aim: To establish the prevalence of comorbidities and their association with HRQOL metrics in GBM following prostate cancer treatment.

Methods: We evaluated HRQOL and prevalence of comorbidities in 193 GBM from the United States and Canada in a cross-sectional, online survey: the Masked for Review. HRQOL was measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).

Main Outcome Measures: Our outcomes included comorbidity prevalence, mean differences for HRQOL scores by comorbidity status, and mean differences for HRQOL by comorbidity count.

Results: GBM were found to have a higher prevalence of blood vessel disease and mental health disorders but lower prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes when compared to published data in general prostate cancer populations. Statistically significant reductions in HRQOL metrics were associated with mental health diagnoses, diabetes, and obesity. Increased number of comorbidities was also associated with reductions in HRQOL metrics in nearly all categories.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the worse QOL outcomes in GBM following prostate cancer treatment may be due to differences in comorbidity burden. This study is the first to evaluate the relationship between comorbidities and HRQOL outcomes in GBM. Limitations of this study include a small sample size and cross-sectional study design. If confirmed in larger, longitudinal, clinically confirmed studies, these findings indicate a need to intervene on and consider comorbidities in GBM diagnosed with prostate cancer. Haggart R, Polter E, Ross M, et al. Comorbidity Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life in Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment. Sex Med 2021;9:100439.

Citing Articles

Does sexual rehabilitation work for gay and bisexual prostate cancer patients? Acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy results from the Restore-2 randomized controlled trial.

Rosser B, Kohli N, Bates A, Talley K, Wright M, Polter E J Cancer Surviv. 2024; .

PMID: 39266938 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01672-6.


"Ultimately, You Realize You're on Your Own": The Impact of Prostate Cancer on Gay and Bisexual Men Couples.

Daniels J, Stephenson R, Langer S, Northouse L, Odouli R, Amarasekera C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(10).

PMID: 37239485 PMC: 10218571. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105756.


Prostate Cancer in Sexual Minorities: Epidemiology, Screening and Diagnosis, Treatment, and Quality of Life.

Yazdanpanah O, Benjamin D, Kalebasty A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37174119 PMC: 10177609. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092654.


A Learning Health System Approach to Cancer Survivorship Care Among LGBTQ+ Communities.

Dunne W, Adebayo N, Danner S, Post S, OBrian C, Tom L JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 19(1):e103-e114.

PMID: 36475752 PMC: 10166358. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00386.


LGBTQI cancer patients' quality of life and distress: A comparison by gender, sexuality, age, cancer type and geographical remoteness.

Ussher J, Allison K, Perz J, Power R Front Oncol. 2022; 12:873642.

PMID: 36203463 PMC: 9530284. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873642.


References
1.
Thomas R, Burger R, Harper A, Kanema S, Mwenge L, Vanqa N . Differences in health-related quality of life between HIV-positive and HIV-negative people in Zambia and South Africa: a cross-sectional baseline survey of the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5(11):e1133-e1141. PMC: 5640509. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30367-4. View

2.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

3.
Clement N, MacDonald D, Simpson A . The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 22(8):1933-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2776-5. View

4.
Skolarus T, Dunn R, Sanda M, Chang P, Greenfield T, Litwin M . Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Urology. 2014; 85(1):101-5. PMC: 4274392. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.044. View

5.
Wassersug R, Lyons A, Duncan D, Dowsett G, Pitts M . Diagnostic and outcome differences between heterosexual and nonheterosexual men treated for prostate cancer. Urology. 2013; 82(3):565-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.022. View