» Articles » PMID: 34632538

Unique Patterns of Hearing Loss and Cognition in Older Adults' Neural Responses to Cues for Speech Recognition Difficulty

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Oct 11
PMID 34632538
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Older adults with hearing loss experience significant difficulties understanding speech in noise, perhaps due in part to limited benefit from supporting executive functions that enable the use of environmental cues signaling changes in listening conditions. Here we examined the degree to which 41 older adults (60.56-86.25 years) exhibited cortical responses to informative listening difficulty cues that communicated the listening difficulty for each trial compared to neutral cues that were uninformative of listening difficulty. Word recognition was significantly higher for informative compared to uninformative cues in a + 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) condition, and response latencies were significantly shorter for informative cues in the + 10 dB SNR and the more-challenging + 2 dB SNR conditions. Informative cues were associated with elevated blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast in visual and parietal cortex. A cue-SNR interaction effect was observed in the cingulo-opercular (CO) network, such that activity only differed between SNR conditions when an informative cue was presented. That is, participants used the informative cues to prepare for changes in listening difficulty from one trial to the next. This cue-SNR interaction effect was driven by older adults with more low-frequency hearing loss and was not observed for those with more high-frequency hearing loss, poorer set-shifting task performance, and lower frontal operculum gray matter volume. These results suggest that proactive strategies for engaging CO adaptive control may be important for older adults with high-frequency hearing loss to optimize speech recognition in changing and challenging listening conditions.

Citing Articles

Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.

Eckert M, Matthews L, Vaden Jr K, Dubno J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 67(12):4811-4828.

PMID: 39475684 PMC: 11666980. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00333.

References
1.
Best V, Marrone N, Mason C, Kidd Jr G, Shinn-Cunningham B . Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008; 10(1):142-9. PMC: 2644386. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0146-7. View

2.
Eckert M, Harris K, Lang H, Lewis M, Schmiedt R, Schulte B . Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease. Hear Res. 2020; 402:108109. PMC: 7927149. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108109. View

3.
Dubno J, Eckert M, Lee F, Matthews L, Schmiedt R . Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013; 14(5):687-701. PMC: 3767874. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0396-x. View

4.
Heideman S, Rohenkohl G, Chauvin J, Palmer C, van Ede F, Nobre A . Anticipatory neural dynamics of spatial-temporal orienting of attention in younger and older adults. Neuroimage. 2018; 178:46-56. PMC: 6057272. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.002. View

5.
Kitterick P, Bailey P, Summerfield A . Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127(4):2498-508. DOI: 10.1121/1.3327507. View