» Articles » PMID: 34632321

Physicians' Strategies for Using Family History Data: Having the Data is Not the Same As Using the Data

Overview
Journal JAMIA Open
Date 2021 Oct 11
PMID 34632321
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify needs in a clinical decision support tool development by exploring how primary care providers currently collect and use family health history (FHH).

Design: Survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to a mix of primary and specialty care clinicians within the University of Utah Health system (40 surveys, 12 interviews).

Results: Three key themes emerged regarding providers' collection and use of FHH: (1) Strategies for collecting FHH vary by level of effort; (2) Documentation practices extend beyond the electronic health record's dedicated FHH module; and (3) Providers desire feedback from genetic services consultation and are uncertain how to refer patients to genetic services.

Conclusion: Study findings highlight the varying degrees of engagement that providers have with collecting FHH. Improving the integration of FHH into workflow, and providing decision support, as well as links and tools to help providers better utilize genetic counseling may improve patient care.

Citing Articles

Creating a family health history interview protocol for use with undergraduate health professional students: A scoping review.

Rooks R, Ford C, Bennett J, Braxton T Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025; 9:100568.

PMID: 39877313 PMC: 11772959. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100568.


Identification of Individuals With Hereditary Cancer Risk Through Multiple Data Sources: A Population-Based Method Using the GARDE Platform and The Utah Population Database.

Del Fiol G, Madsen M, Bradshaw R, Newman M, Kaphingst K, Tavtigian S JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024; 8:e2400142.

PMID: 39571109 PMC: 11583850. DOI: 10.1200/CCI-24-00142.


Usability, Engagement, and Report Usefulness of Chatbot-Based Family Health History Data Collection: Mixed Methods Analysis.

Nguyen M, Sedoc J, Taylor C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55164.

PMID: 39348188 PMC: 11474129. DOI: 10.2196/55164.


The UTHealth Houston Adult Cardiovascular Genomics Certificate Program: Efficacy and Impact on Healthcare Professionals.

Garner M, Rajani B, Vaidya P, Abu Dayeh S, Cecchi A, Miyake C Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38947076 PMC: 11213163. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4469272/v1.


Evaluating a New Digital App-Based Program for Heart Health: Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.

Lockwood K, Kulkarni P, Paruthi J, Buch L, Chaffard M, Schitter E JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e50446.

PMID: 38787598 PMC: 11161712. DOI: 10.2196/50446.


References
1.
Sabatino S, McCarthy E, Phillips R, Burns R . Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007; 31(5):375-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003. View

2.
Lauer R . Role of family history and family testing in cardiovascular risk assessment. Am J Med. 1999; 107(2A):14S-15S. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00138-2. View

3.
Lowery J, Ahnen D, Schroy 3rd P, Hampel H, Baxter N, Boland C . Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review. Cancer. 2016; 122(17):2633-45. PMC: 5575812. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30080. View

4.
Doerr M, Edelman E, Gabitzsch E, Eng C, Teng K . Formative evaluation of clinician experience with integrating family history-based clinical decision support into clinical practice. J Pers Med. 2015; 4(2):115-36. PMC: 4263968. DOI: 10.3390/jpm4020115. View

5.
Zazove P, Plegue M, Uhlmann W, Ruffin 4th M . Prompting Primary Care Providers about Increased Patient Risk As a Result of Family History: Does It Work?. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015; 28(3):334-42. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140149. View