» Articles » PMID: 34631005

Site-Specific Volumetric Skeletal Changes in Women with a Distal Forearm Fracture

Overview
Journal J Osteoporos
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Oct 11
PMID 34631005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess site-specific volumetric bone and muscle changes, as well as demographic and biochemical changes, in postmenopausal women with a low-energy distal forearm fracture.

Methods: In a cross-sectional case-control study, postmenopausal women with a distal forearm fracture were compared with age- and gender-matched controls. In total, 203 postmenopausal women (104 cases and 99 controls), with a mean age of 65 years, were included. Measurements included peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as blood sampling and questionnaires.

Results: Forearm trabecular volumetric BMD and total BMD assessed with pQCT were significantly lower in fracture cases compared to controls ( < 0.001). Significantly higher cross-sectional area, lower cortical BMD, and lower cortical thickness were seen in women with fracture ( < 0.033, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Postmenopausal women with fracture had significantly lower hip and spine areal BMD assessed with DXA ( < 0.001). Activity level was higher and a history of falling was more frequent in women with fracture ( < 0.019 and < 0.001, respectively). Vertebral fracture was observed in 24 women (22%) with a distal forearm fracture. Muscle area, muscle density, PTH, and 25OHD did not differ between fracture cases and controls.

Conclusion: A distal forearm fracture was associated with site-specific and central bone changes. Postmenopausal women with fracture had a larger bone area in combination with a thinner cortex and lower site-specific total BMD. In addition, women with fracture had a higher activity level, an increased occurrence of previous fall accidents, and a high prevalence of vertebral fractures. Forearm muscle composition, PTH, and 25OHD were not associated with forearm fracture. Fracture preventive measures following a low-energy distal forearm fracture seem beneficial.

References
1.
Crockett K, Arnold C, Farthing J, Chilibeck P, Johnston J, Bath B . Bone strength and muscle properties in postmenopausal women with and without a recent distal radius fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2015; 26(10):2461-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3160-8. View

2.
Muller M, Webber C, Bouxsein M . Predicting the failure load of the distal radius. Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14(4):345-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1380-9. View

3.
Kelsey J, Prill M, Keegan T, Tanner H, Bernstein A, Quesenberry Jr C . Reducing the risk for distal forearm fracture: preserve bone mass, slow down, and don't fall!. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 16(6):681-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1745-8. View

4.
Earnshaw S, Cawte S, Worley A, Hosking D . Colles' fracture of the wrist as an indicator of underlying osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a prospective study of bone mineral density and bone turnover rate. Osteoporos Int. 1998; 8(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050048. View

5.
Augat P, Iida H, Jiang Y, Diao E, Genant H . Distal radius fractures: mechanisms of injury and strength prediction by bone mineral assessment. J Orthop Res. 1998; 16(5):629-35. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160517. View