» Articles » PMID: 34622309

Ridge Preservation in Maxillary Molar Extraction Sites with Severe Periodontitis: a Prospective Observational Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Oct 8
PMID 34622309
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess alveolar bone changes and treatment modality alterations after ridge preservation on maxillary molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis, compared to natural healing.

Material And Methods: Thirty-six maxillary infected-molar teeth either receiving ridge preservation (RG group) or undergoing natural healing (NT group) were investigated. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning was performed immediately after surgery (the baseline) and repeated 6 months later to measure the linear and volumetric changes of the sockets.

Results: Based on radiographic measurements, alveolar bone width decreased by 1.58 ± 4.61 mm in the NT group but increased by 3.74 ± 4.17 mm in the RG group (p < 0.05). Significant increases in ridge height at the center of both the NT (7.54 ± 4.54 mm) and RG (9.20 ± 3.26 mm) groups were observed. Mean sinus pneumatization was 0.19 ± 0.45 mm in the RG group and 0.59 ± 0.63 mm in the NT group (p < 0.05). The relative increase in total ridge volume was 8.0% and 35.5% in the NT and RG group, respectively (p < 0.05). Implant placement with additional sinus augmentation procedure was performed in 16.7% of the RG group cases, whereas 50% in the NT group cases.

Conclusions: Ridge preservation in the maxillary molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis can improve alveolar ridge dimensions and decrease the necessity of advanced regenerative procedures at implant placement compared to natural healing.

Clinical Relevance: Ridge preservation on maxillary molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis maintained the vertical bone height more efficiently and resulted in less need for sinus augmentation procedures at 6 months compared to natural healing.

Citing Articles

[Evaluation of micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis].

Shi Y, Wei Y, Hu W, Xu T, Zhang H Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 57(1):33-41.

PMID: 39856504 PMC: 11759800.


Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study.

Lam L, Ivanovski S, Lee R Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 35(12):1568-1584.

PMID: 39165113 PMC: 11629457. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14344.


Healing of Extraction Sites after Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Retrospective Study.

Khaddour A, Ghita R, Ionescu M, Rica R, Mercut V, Manolea H Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38927802 PMC: 11201034. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060566.


Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Molar Extraction Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fok M, Pelekos G, Jin L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592010 PMC: 10931845. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051198.


The Bone Bridge Technique Utilizing Bone from the Lateral Wall of the Maxillary Sinus for Ridge Augmentation: Case Reports of a 1-7 Year Follow-Up.

Park W, Han J, Kang P Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(9).

PMID: 37763747 PMC: 10536201. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091626.


References
1.
Farina R, Pramstraller M, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L . Alveolar ridge dimensions in maxillary posterior sextants: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(10):1138-1144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02087.x. View

2.
Kopecka D, Simunek A, Brazda T, Rota M, Slezak R, Capek L . Relationship between subsinus bone height and bone volume requirements for dental implants: a human radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27(1):48-54. View

3.
Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, Shanbhag V . Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness, ostium patency, and residual ridge heights in the posterior maxilla: implications for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 25(6):755-60. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12168. View

4.
Padhye N, Bhatavadekar N . Quantitative Assessment of the Edentulous Posterior Maxilla for Implant Therapy: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020; 19(1):125-130. PMC: 6954912. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01236-7. View

5.
Seong W, Barczak M, Jung J, Basu S, Olin P, Conrad H . Prevalence of sinus augmentation associated with maxillary posterior implants. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 39(6):680-8. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00122. View