» Articles » PMID: 34621998

The Unmet Needs for Identifying the Ideal Bowel Preparation

Overview
Journal JGH Open
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Oct 8
PMID 34621998
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one-third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient-dependent and procedure-dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night-time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure.

Citing Articles

Day before late regimen vs standard split dose of low-volume PEG-CS for early morning colonoscopy: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Pasquale L, Grande G, Zagari R, Biancheri P, Pisani A, Da Massa Carrara P Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a25158539.

PMID: 40007647 PMC: 11855237. DOI: 10.1055/a-2515-8539.


Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Educating Outpatients about Bowel Preparation.

Chen H, Tu M, Chen M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(14).

PMID: 39057517 PMC: 11275862. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12141374.


Pharmacokinetics of oral mannitol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Fiori G, Spada C, Soru P, Tontini G, Bravi I, Cesana B Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 15(10):2448-2457.

PMID: 37074807 PMC: 9579383. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13373.


Effect of Bowel Preparation to Colonoscopy Interval on Preparation Quality and Colonoscopy Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.

Gao Y, Lin X Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022; 34(1):26-34.

PMID: 36511605 PMC: 9984965. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.22033.


Oral mannitol for bowel preparation: a dose-finding phase II study.

Spada C, Fiori G, Uebel P, Tontini G, Cesaro P, Grazioli L Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(12):1991-2002.

PMID: 36287232 PMC: 9649514. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03405-z.


References
1.
Szaflarska-Poplawska A, Tunowska D, Sobieska-Poszwa O, Krogulska A . The Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Different 1-Day Bowel Preparation Regimens for Pediatric Colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020; 2019:3230654. PMC: 6935457. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3230654. View

2.
Friedemann-Sanchez G, Griffin J, Partin M . Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs. Health Expect. 2007; 10(2):148-60. PMC: 5060384. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00430.x. View

3.
John J, Al-Douri A, Candelaria B, Gandhi S, Guzik P, Herndon B . Colonoscopy Quality and Adherence to Postpolypectomy Surveillance Guidelines in an Underinsured Clinic System. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020; 2020:6240687. PMC: 7648690. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6240687. View

4.
Kutyla M, Gray M, von Hippel C, Hourigan L, Kendall B, Whaley A . Improving the Quality of Bowel Preparation: Rewarding Patients for Success or Intensive Patient Education?. Dig Dis. 2020; 39(2):113-118. DOI: 10.1159/000510461. View

5.
Cuffari C, Ciciora S, Ando M, Boules M, Croffie J . Pediatric bowel preparation: Sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, citric acid polyethylene glycol, a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(40):6260-6269. PMC: 7596638. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260. View