» Articles » PMID: 34621808

A Perspective on Strategic Enrichment for Brain Development: Is This the Key to Animal Happiness?

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2021 Oct 8
PMID 34621808
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Livestock animals are sentient beings with cognitive and emotional capacities and their brain development, similar to humans and other animal species, is affected by their surrounding environmental conditions. Current intensive production systems, through the restrictions of safely managing large numbers of animals, may not facilitate optimal neurological development which can contribute to negative affective states, abnormal behaviors, and reduce experiences of positive welfare states. Enrichment provision is likely necessary to enable animals to reach toward their neurological potential, optimizing their cognitive capacity and emotional intelligence, improving their ability to cope with stressors as well as experience positive affect. However, greater understanding of the neurological impacts of specific types of enrichment strategies is needed to ensure enrichment programs are effectively improving the individual's welfare. Enrichment programs during animal development that target key neurological pathways that may be most utilized by the individual within specific types of housing or management situations is proposed to result in the greatest positive impacts on animal welfare. Research within livestock animals is needed in this regard to ensure future deployment of enrichment for livestock animals is widespread and effective in enhancing their neurological capacities.

Citing Articles

Adult neurogenesis and the microbiota-gut-brain axis in farm animals: underestimated and understudied parameters for improving welfare in livestock farming.

Hillerer K, Gimsa U Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1493605.

PMID: 39664450 PMC: 11631930. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1493605.


Human-computer interactions with farm animals-enhancing welfare through precision livestock farming and artificial intelligence.

Neethirajan S, Scott S, Mancini C, Boivin X, Strand E Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1490851.

PMID: 39611113 PMC: 11604036. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1490851.


Assessing Animal Welfare Risk in Fibre-Producing Animals by Applying the Five Domains Framework.

Salobir K, Kirchner M, Haager D Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38067046 PMC: 10705615. DOI: 10.3390/ani13233696.


Perceptions of Farm Animal Sentience and Suffering: Evidence from the BRIC Countries and the United States.

Mata F, Jaeger B, Domingues I Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496937 PMC: 9736651. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233416.


Positive Aspects of Welfare in Sheep: Current Debates and Future Opportunities.

Muhammad M, Stokes J, Manning L Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496786 PMC: 9736654. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233265.

References
1.
Meagher R, Strazhnik E, von Keyserlingk M, Weary D . Assessing the motivation to learn in cattle. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6847. PMC: 7176709. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63848-1. View

2.
Lee C, Colditz I, Campbell D . A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing. Front Vet Sci. 2018; 5:187. PMC: 6110809. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00187. View

3.
Dawkins M . Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology (Jena). 2005; 106(4):383-7. DOI: 10.1078/0944-2006-00122. View

4.
Marsh L, Hutchinson M, McLaughlan C, Musolino S, Hebart M, Terry R . Evaluation of miRNA as Biomarkers of Emotional Valence in Pigs. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8300371. DOI: 10.3390/ani11072054. View

5.
Gelfo F, Mandolesi L, Serra L, Sorrentino G, Caltagirone C . The Neuroprotective Effects of Experience on Cognitive Functions: Evidence from Animal Studies on the Neurobiological Bases of Brain Reserve. Neuroscience. 2017; 370:218-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.065. View