» Articles » PMID: 34611439

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Different Complexity Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Oct 6
PMID 34611439
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) from a retrospective single-center dataset.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of 210 patients who underwent open (n=91) or laparoscopic (n =119) partial nephrectomy for RCC was conducted between 2012 and 2015. All patients were grouped into low complexity, moderate complexity, and high complexity according to the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score, respectively. The rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, operative time, conversion of laparoscopic procedure to open surgery, and postoperative length of stay were assessed for both procedures.

Results: In low complexity group (n=93), patients undergoing LPN (n=52) under ischemia conditions had significantly longer renal artery clamp time (p < 0.001) and operative time (p = 0.001) compared with OPN (n=41). However, patients undergoing LPN had a significantly less postoperative length of stay (p=0.005) and estimated blood loss (p < 0.001) compared with OPN. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of complications between LPN and OPN. In the moderate complexity group (n=114), 67 and 47 patients underwent LPN and OPN, respectively. LPN had notably longer warm ischemia time (p < 0.001) and operative time (p < 0.001) compared with OPN. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of complications, estimated blood loss, and postoperative length of stay between LPN and OPN. In the high complexity group (n=3), all patients underwent OPN.

Conclusion: OPN and LPN procedures performed in patients with low and moderate complexity tumors based on the RENAL Nephrometry score offer acceptable and comparable results. When applied to low complexity tumors, our data suggest that laparoscopic NSS is an effective, minimally invasive therapeutic approach with the advantages of less blood loss, earlier hospital discharge, and more rapid convalescence.

Citing Articles

Predicting post-surgical complications using renal scoring systems.

Golagha M, Hesswani C, Singh S, Dehghani Firouzabadi F, Sheikhy A, Koller C Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(3):1273-1284.

PMID: 39395046 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04627-8.


Impact of No-Clamping Partial Nephrectomy on Early Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Preservation.

Falkowski P, Jaromin M, Ojdana M, Kutwin P, Konecki T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336978 PMC: 11432549. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185491.


Prediction of Fuhrman nuclear grade for clear cell renal carcinoma by a multi-information fusion model that incorporates CT-based features of tumor and serum tumor associated material.

Zhang Y, Sun Z, Ma H, Wang C, Zhang W, Liu J J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(17):15855-15865.

PMID: 37672076 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05353-2.


Lost Needle During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Koida Y, Kiuchi H, Yoshioka F, Soda T, Sekii K Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42119.

PMID: 37602099 PMC: 10436752. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42119.


Characterization of renal artery variation in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and the predictive value of accessory renal artery in pathological grading of renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective and observational study.

Lv D, Zhou H, Cui F, Wen J, Shuang W BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):274.

PMID: 36966274 PMC: 10039570. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10756-y.


References
1.
Zhou S, Wang X, Zhao C, Liu Q, Zhou H, Zheng Z . Laparoscopic vs open colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients: short- and long-term outcomes and predictors for overall and disease-free survival. BMC Surg. 2019; 19(1):137. PMC: 6744685. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0596-3. View

2.
Sprenkle P, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer K, Dalbagni G, Russo P . Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4-7 centimeters. Eur Urol. 2011; 61(3):593-9. PMC: 6693652. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.040. View

3.
Kim J, Lim J, Nguyen S . Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Does laparoscopic surgery provide an adequate oncologic resection?. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 9(9):448-455. PMC: 5605344. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.448. View

4.
Kamel A, Badawy M, Elganzoury H, Elkhouly A, Elesaily K, Eldahshan S . Clinical versus Pathologic staging of Renal Tumors: Role of Multi-Detector CT Urography. Electron Physician. 2016; 8(1):1791-5. PMC: 4768930. DOI: 10.19082/1791. View

5.
Kutikov A, Uzzo R . The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009; 182(3):844-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035. View