» Articles » PMID: 34610520

Attitudes and Beliefs About Recreational Cannabis Legalization Among Cannabis-using Young Adults in Los Angeles: Impact on Concurrent Cannabis Practices and Problematic Cannabis Use

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Oct 5
PMID 34610520
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study investigated differences in attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) among cannabis-using young adults comprised of medical cannabis patients (MCP) and non-patient users (NPU). We further investigated whether these variations are associated with concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use.

Method: Cannabis-using young adults (N = 301) were interviewed between 2017 and 2018 - after RCL and through the early months after storefront sales began. Latent class analysis empirically derived groups based on participants' attitudes/beliefs about the impact of RCL. Socio-demographic factors, patient status, medicinal and/or recreational use, and social norms differentiated latent class memberships, while concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use served as distal outcomes. The manual Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars (BCH) three-step process modeled all covariates and distal outcomes simultaneously in the final LCA solution.

Results: Three patterns emerged: Impacted (RCL had broad impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 113), Partially-Impacted (RCL had some impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 131) and Neutral (RCL had no/limited impact) (n = 57). MCP were more likely to be Neutral than Partially-Impacted users while those who reported recreational cannabis use were more likely to be Impacted than Neutral users. Class membership predicted cannabis practices and problematic use with Impacted individuals reporting the greatest recent days of use, number of hits per day, and highest scores in problematic cannabis use compared to Partially-Impacted and Neutral users.

Conclusion: Variability in attitudes/beliefs about RCL served as strong drivers of concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use. Findings provide an important baseline for tracking attitudes/beliefs' long-term health and substance use impact as retail cannabis sales evolve.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and correlates of severe problematic cannabis use: analysis of a population-based survey in Jamaica.

Lalwani K, De La Haye W, Kerr K, Abel W, Sewell C Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1465963.

PMID: 39600793 PMC: 11588747. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1465963.


Household Compositions and Substance Use among Young Adults in the U.S.

Han B, Tomoyasu N, Einstein E, Jones C, Compton W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200676 PMC: 11354213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081067.


Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.

Fedorova E, Mitchel A, Finkelstein M, Ataiants J, Wong C, Conn B J Psychoactive Drugs. 2023; 57(1):99-109.

PMID: 37997888 PMC: 11116271. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515.


Association of self-reported use of cannabis for the purpose of improving physical, mental, and sleep health with problematic cannabis use risk.

Jacobs W, Merianos A, Quinn P, Barrington-Trimis J, Leventhal A BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1560.

PMID: 37587415 PMC: 10429075. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16324-0.


A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.

Grigsby T, Lopez A, Albers L, Rogers C, Forster M Subst Abuse. 2023; 17:11782218231166622.

PMID: 37056398 PMC: 10087658. DOI: 10.1177/11782218231166622.

References
1.
Goodman S, Wadsworth E, Leos-Toro C, Hammond D . Prevalence and forms of cannabis use in legal vs. illegal recreational cannabis markets. Int J Drug Policy. 2020; 76:102658. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102658. View

2.
Hasin D, OBrien C, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A . DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(8):834-51. PMC: 3767415. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782. View

3.
Cerda M, Wall M, Feng T, Keyes K, Sarvet A, Schulenberg J . Association of State Recreational Marijuana Laws With Adolescent Marijuana Use. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 171(2):142-149. PMC: 5365078. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3624. View

4.
Hall W, Lynskey M . Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use: the US experience. World Psychiatry. 2020; 19(2):179-186. PMC: 7215066. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20735. View

5.
Metrik J, Bassett S, Aston E, Jackson K, Borsari B . Medicinal versus Recreational Cannabis Use among Returning Veterans. Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2018; 4(1):6-20. PMC: 6037171. DOI: 10.1037/tps0000133. View