» Articles » PMID: 34606586

The Difference in Postoperative Pulmonary Functional Change Between Upper and Lower Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Abstract

Objectives: Through 3-dimensional lung volumetric and morphological analyses, we aimed to evaluate the difference in postoperative functional changes between upper and lower thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Methods: A total of 145 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic upper lobectomy (UL) were matched with 145 patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic lower lobectomy (LL) between April 2012 and December 2018, based on their sex, age, smoking history, operation side, and pulmonary function. Spirometry and computed tomography were performed before and 6 months after the operation. In addition, the postoperative pulmonary function, volume and morphological changes between the 2 groups were compared.

Results: The rate of postoperative decreased and the ratio of actual to predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s were significantly higher after LL than after UL (P < 0.001 for both). The tendency above was similar irrespective of the resected side. The postoperative actual volumes of the ipsilateral residual lobe and contralateral lung were larger than the preoperatively measured volumes in each side lobectomy. Moreover, the increased change was particularly remarkable in the middle lobe after right LL. The change in the D-value, representing the structural complexity of the lung, was better maintained in the left lung after LL than after UL (P = 0.042).

Conclusions: Pulmonary function after thoracoscopic LL was superior to that after UL because the upward displacement and the pulmonary reserves of the remaining lobe appeared more robust after LL.

Citing Articles

Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials.

Chen B, Tang W, Chen J, Kang M, Xie J, Wang W World J Surg Oncol. 2025; 23(1):25.

PMID: 39871356 PMC: 11771030. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-025-03669-6.

References
1.
Tane S, Nishikubo M, Kitazume M, Fujibayashi Y, Kimura K, Kitamura Y . Cluster analysis of emphysema for predicting pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 60(3):607-613. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab237. View

2.
Yilmaz C, Tustison N, Dane D, Ravikumar P, Takahashi M, Gee J . Progressive adaptation in regional parenchyma mechanics following extensive lung resection assessed by functional computed tomography. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011; 111(4):1150-8. PMC: 3191793. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00527.2011. View

3.
Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Sugihara N, Sugimura K . Emphysema quantification by combining percentage and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(5):W453-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10781. View

4.
Sekine Y, Iwata T, Chiyo M, Yasufuku K, Motohashi S, Yoshida S . Minimal alteration of pulmonary function after lobectomy in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76(2):356-61; discussion 362. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00489-2. View

5.
Hole D, Watt G, Davey-Smith G, Hart C, Gillis C, Hawthorne V . Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study. BMJ. 1996; 313(7059):711-5; discussion 715-6. PMC: 2352103. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.711. View