» Articles » PMID: 34605667

Investigating Student Perceptions of Instructor Talk: Alignment with Researchers' Categorizations and Analysis of Remembered Language

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34605667
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Instructor Talk-the noncontent language used by an instructor during class time-is likely to influence learning environments in science classrooms from the student perspective. Despite Instructor Talk being found in every science course thus far, investigations into student perceptions and memories of it are limited. We investigated to what extent undergraduate biology students 1) were aligned with researchers in their perceptions of Instructor Talk as Positively Phrased or Negatively Phrased and 2) remembered Instructor Talk. To test these ideas, we engaged 90 biology students in a multipart assessment. First, students were given randomly selected Instructor Talk quotes, half Positively Phrased and half Negatively Phrased, and were asked to evaluate each quote as promoting a positive or negative learning environment. Overall, students evaluated the Instructor Talk quotes similarly to researchers' categorizations ( < 0.0001). Second, students were asked to provide examples of remembered instructor language from their biology courses that they felt promoted a positive or negative learning environment. Most students shared multiple memories, and ∼75% of these memories could be coded with the Instructor Talk frameworks. Given that students perceive and remember Instructor Talk as impacting the learning environment, Instructor Talk may be an explanatory variable for differential student outcomes across studies of active learning.

Citing Articles

A Model for Emotional Intelligence in Biology Education Research.

Tea A, Ovid D CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024; 23(4):es12.

PMID: 39437126 PMC: 11659874. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.23-10-0198.


"They helped me through the semester": electronic instructor messages can foster the instructor-student relationship.

Murray C, Osterhage J J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024; 25(1):e0000424.

PMID: 38547471 PMC: 11044634. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00004-24.


Why Students Struggle in Undergraduate Biology: Sources and Solutions.

Tracy C, Driessen E, Beatty A, Lamb T, Pruett J, Botello J CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022; 21(3):ar48.

PMID: 35759627 PMC: 9582825. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-09-0289.


Investigating Instructor Talk among Graduate Teaching Assistants in Undergraduate Biology Laboratory Classrooms.

Gelinas K, Ovid D, Amaya-Mejia W, Ayala R, Baek H, Gasmin E CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022; 21(2):ar31.

PMID: 35471057 PMC: 9508911. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-10-0302.

References
1.
Betz N, Leffers J, Thor E, Fux M, Nesnera K, Tanner K . Cognitive Construal-Consistent Instructor Language in the Undergraduate Biology Classroom. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019; 18(4):ar63. PMC: 6889842. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-04-0076. View

2.
Owens M, Trujillo G, Seidel S, Harrison C, Farrar K, Benton H . Collectively Improving Our Teaching: Attempting Biology Department-wide Professional Development in Scientific Teaching. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018; 17(1). PMC: 6007775. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.17-06-0106. View

3.
Tharayil S, Borrego M, Prince M, Nguyen K, Shekhar P, Finelli C . Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. Int J STEM Educ. 2019; 5(1):7. PMC: 6310406. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y. View

4.
Schinske J, Tanner K . Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently). CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 13(2):159-66. PMC: 4041495. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054. View

5.
Seidel S, Reggi A, Schinske J, Burrus L, Tanner K . Beyond the Biology: A Systematic Investigation of Noncontent Instructor Talk in an Introductory Biology Course. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 14(4):ar43. PMC: 4710404. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-03-0049. View