» Articles » PMID: 34604554

Telling Donor-conceived Children About Their Conception: Evaluation of the Use of the Donor Conception Network Children's Books

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34604554
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

If parents have used donated gametes, it is a personal choice whether they disclose to their children. For those that do, there is, however, little advice on how to tell their children. The Donor Conception Network (DCN) has made a series of books to help parents disclose. This study evaluated parents' experience of using these books. An online survey with both quantitative and qualitative questions was used. The DCN membership and social media were used to publicize the survey, and 108 responses were analysed. At the time of conception, the parents' family types were mainly mother and father (56.5%) and solo mothers (36.1%). The method of conception was mainly donor spermatozoa (55.6%) followed by donor egg (38.0%), double donation (8.3%) and one case of surrogacy. Most parents had read the book to their children before 2 years of age (76.9%). Before reading the books, some of the parents had some confidence in telling (43.5%) or were very confident in telling (30.6%). After reading the books, 60.2% reported having much more confidence in telling. Most parents felt their children had no understanding (76.8%) or only some understanding (22.3%) of donor conception before reading the books. After reading the books most parents felt their children's understanding had increased (71.3%). Most parents felt that reading the books had given them more confidence in using donor conception language (90.7%). The use of books to tell children about their conception may be a useful resource for parents wishing to be open with their children.

Citing Articles

Parents' disclosure to their donor-conceived children in the last 10 years and factors affecting disclosure: a narrative review.

Duff M, Goedeke S Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 30(4):488-527.

PMID: 38687968 PMC: 11215159. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae010.

References
1.
Schrijvers A, Bos H, van Rooij F, Gerrits T, van der Veen F, Mochtar M . Being a donor-child: wishes for parental support, peer support and counseling. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 40(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1396313. View

2.
Ilioi E, Blake L, Jadva V, Roman G, Golombok S . The role of age of disclosure of biological origins in the psychological wellbeing of adolescents conceived by reproductive donation: a longitudinal study from age 1 to age 14. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016; 58(3):315-324. PMC: 5324532. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12667. View

3.
Frith L . Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(5):818-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.818. View

4.
Harper J, Kennett D, Reisel D . The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(6):1135-40. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew065. View

5.
Freeman T, Zadeh S, Smith V, Golombok S . Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 33(5):592-600. PMC: 5084687. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.08.004. View