The Learning Curve of Computer-Assisted Free Flap Jaw Reconstruction Surgery Using 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Plates: A Cumulative Sum Analysis

Overview

Journal Front Oncol

Specialty Oncology

Date 2021 Oct 4

PMID 34604076

Citations 7

Authors

Wang-Yong Zhu

Wing Shan Choi

May Chun Mei Wong

Jingya Jane Pu

Wei-Fa Yang

Yu-Xiong Su

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Computer-assisted jaw reconstruction (CAJR) has benefits in reducing operation time and improving reconstruction accuracy, compared to conventional freehand jaw reconstruction. However, no information is available regarding learning curves in CAJR with the use of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates (PSSP). The purpose of this study was to assess surgical outcomes and learning curve for the first 58 consecutive CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP performed by a single surgical team in a single institution.

Methods: In a prospective study, consecutive patients who underwent free flap CAJR using 3D-printed PSSP were included. The determination of proficiency, based on the cumulative sum of surgical success (no major adjustment of 3D-printed PSSP, flap survival) passing the acceptable boundary line of cumulative sum analysis, was the primary outcome. To find out any potential factors influencing the learning curve, baseline characteristics of patients were compared before and after proficiency achievement. Secondary outcomes included inflexion points of the total operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, measured by the cumulative sum analysis.

Results: From December 2016 to November 2020, 58 consecutive cases underwent surgery performed by a single surgical team. The overall surgical success rate was 94.8% (55/58). A three-stage learning curve of primary outcome was observed. The proficiency was achieved after 23 cases. The proportions of advanced tumor staging and concomitant surgery after obtaining proficiency were significantly higher than those before achieving proficiency ( = 0.046 and < 0.001, respectively). Mean values of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation were 532.5 ± 119.2 min, 1,006.8 ± 547.2 ml, 16.1 ± 6.3 days, and 0.9 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. Two trends of learning curve were observed in the CUSUM analyses of total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation, in which the first and second inflexion points occurred between 8 and 17 cases and between 43 and 46 cases, respectively.

Conclusion: Our results revealed a three-stage learning curve of CAJR with the use of PSSP, including initial learning, plateau, and overlearning. Based on CUSUM analysis, the surgical proficiency was achieved after 23 cases, and total operation time, length of hospital stay, and bone graft deviation stabilized after 8-17 cases.

Citing Articles

Impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery into clinical practice for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Moorthy V, Chua I, Tan S, Pillai A, Tan B, Yam M J Orthop. 2024; 57:60-64.

PMID: 38994439 PMC: 11233788. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.009.

Costs and duration of orthodontic-surgical treatment with mandibular advancement surgery.

Niemi P, Kortelainen M, Harjunmaa U, Waltimo-Siren J Eur J Orthod. 2023; 45(5):558-564.

PMID: 37607274 PMC: 10505688. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad051.

Effect of segmental versus marginal mandibular resection on local and lymph node recurrences in oral squamous cell carcinoma: is tumorous bone infiltration or location and resulting soft tissue recurrences a long-term problem?.

Ritschl L, Niu M, Sackerer V, Classen C, Stimmer H, Fichter A J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(13):11093-11103.

PMID: 37344607 PMC: 10465630. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04963-0.

Value of 3D printing technology combined with indocyanine green fluorescent navigation in complex laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Cheng J, Wang Z, Liu J, Dou C, Yao W, Zhang C PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272815.

PMID: 35951521 PMC: 9371281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272815.

Current Trends in the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Jaw following Ablative Surgery.

Pu J, Hakim S, Melville J, Su Y Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(14).

PMID: 35884369 PMC: 9320033. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143308.

References

Barrie J, Jayne D, Wright J, Czoski Murray C, Collinson F, Pavitt S . Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 21(3):829-40. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3348-0. View

De Maesschalck T, Courvoisier D, Scolozzi P . Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 274(1):517-526. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4246-4. View

Pucci R, Weyh A, Smotherman C, Valentini V, Bunnell A, Fernandes R . Accuracy of virtual planned surgery versus conventional free-hand surgery for reconstruction of the mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49(9):1153-1161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.018. View

Yang W, Zhang C, Choi W, Zhu W, Li D, Chen X . A novel 'surgeon-dominated' approach to the design of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates in mandibular reconstruction: a proof-of-concept study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 49(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.005. View

STEINER S, Cook R, Farewell V, Treasure T . Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics. 2003; 1(4):441-52. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.441. View

Weitz J, Bauer F, Hapfelmeier A, Rohleder N, Wolff K, Kesting M . Accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by three-dimensional guided vascularised fibular free flap after segmental mandibulectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54(5):506-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.029. View

Pu J, Choi W, Yu P, Wong M, Lo A, Su Y . Do predetermined surgical margins compromise oncological safety in computer-assisted head and neck reconstruction?. Oral Oncol. 2020; 111:104914. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104914. View

Ciocca L, Marchetti C, Mazzoni S, Baldissara P, Gatto M, Cipriani R . Accuracy of fibular sectioning and insertion into a rapid-prototyped bone plate, for mandibular reconstruction using CAD-CAM technology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(1):28-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.005. View

Zheng G, Su Y, Liao G, Liu H, Zhang S, Liang L . Mandibular reconstruction assisted by preoperative simulation and accurate transferring templates: preliminary report of clinical application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71(9):1613-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.02.018. View

10.

Fliss E, Yanko R, Bracha G, Teman R, Amir A, Horowitz G . The Evolution of the Free Fibula Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: 21 Years of Experience with 128 Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020; 37(4):372-379. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717101. View

11.

Yang W, Choi W, Wong M, Powcharoen W, Zhu W, Tsoi J . Three-Dimensionally Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates Increase Accuracy of Oncologic Head and Neck Reconstruction Versus Conventional Surgical Plates: A Comparative Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 28(1):363-375. PMC: 7752789. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08732-y. View

12.

Awad M, Altman A, Elrefai R, Shipman P, Looney S, Elsalanty M . The use of vascularized fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction; A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47(4):629-641. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.037. View

13.

Cariati P, Cabello Serrano A, Iglesias F, Roman Ramos M, Fernandez Solis J, Martinez Lara I . Unfavorable outcomes in microsurgery: possibilities for improvement. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2019; 53(5):279-287. DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1606005. View

14.

Powcharoen W, Yang W, Li K, Zhu W, Su Y . Computer-Assisted versus Conventional Freehand Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144(6):1417-1428. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006261. View

15.

Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, Tsue T, Girod D . Mandibular reconstruction. Oral Oncol. 2018; 77:111-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.020. View

16.

Ratnagiri R, Jena S, Parvathi P, Srikanth R, Raju G . Reconstruction in head-and-neck cancers - analysis of the learning curve. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 9(2):191-195. PMC: 6251285. DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_66_17. View

17.

Pernar L, Robertson F, Tavakkoli A, Sheu E, Brooks D, Smink D . An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(11):4583-4596. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5520-2. View

18.

Yang W, Choi W, Leung Y, Curtin J, Du R, Zhang C . Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific surgical plates in head and neck reconstruction: A prospective pilot study. Oral Oncol. 2018; 78:31-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.005. View

19.

Bolsin S, Colson M . The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000; 12(5):433-8. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/12.5.433. View

20.

Okay D, Al Shetawi A, Moubayed S, Mourad M, Buchbinder D, Urken M . Worldwide 10-Year Systematic Review of Treatment Trends in Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74(12):2526-2531. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.170. View