» Articles » PMID: 34603974

Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Additively Manufactured SS316L and Ti6Al4V Micro-struts As a Function of Build Angle

Overview
Journal Addit Manuf
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34603974
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Additive manufacturing methods such as laser powder bed fusion (PBF) can produce micro-lattice structures which consist of 'micro-struts', which have properties that differ from the bulk metal and that can vary depending on the orientation of the strut to the build direction (the strut build angle). Characterizing these mechanical and morphological changes would help explain macro-scale lattice behavior. Individual stainless steel (SS316L) and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) laser PBF struts were built at 20°, 40°, 70° and 90° to the build platform, with 3 designed diameters and tested in uniaxial tension (n = 5). Micro-CT was used to quantify changes in surface roughness, eccentricity and cross-section. Average elastic modulus was 61.5 GPa and 37.5 GPa for SS316L and Ti6Al4V respectively, less than the bulk material. Yield strength was uniform over build angle for SS316L, but for Ti6Al4V varied from 40% to 98% of the bulk value from 20° to 90° build angles. All lower angle struts had worse morphology, with higher roughness and less circular cross-sections. These data should help inform micro-lattice design, especially in safety critical applications where lower mechanical performance must be compensated for.

Citing Articles

Stochastic lattice-based porous implant design for improving the stress transfer in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Deng T, Gong S, Cheng Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Li K J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):499.

PMID: 39175032 PMC: 11340161. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05006-1.


A Systematic Review on the Generation of Organic Structures through Additive Manufacturing Techniques.

Bernadi-Forteza A, Mallon M, Velasco-Gallego C, Cubo-Mateo N Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39065345 PMC: 11280941. DOI: 10.3390/polym16142027.


An additively manufactured model for preclinical testing of cervical devices.

Wahbeh J, Hookasian E, Lama J, Alam L, Park S, Sangiorgio S JOR Spine. 2024; 7(1):e1285.

PMID: 38222806 PMC: 10782067. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1285.


The effect of nodal connectivity and strut density within stochastic titanium scaffolds on osteogenesis.

Kechagias S, Theodoridis K, Broomfield J, Malpartida-Cardenas K, Reid R, Georgiou P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1305936.

PMID: 38107615 PMC: 10721980. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1305936.


Total and partial knee arthroplasty implants that maintain native load transfer in the tibia.

Munford M, Stoddart J, Liddle A, Cobb J, Jeffers J Bone Joint Res. 2022; 11(2):91-101.

PMID: 35168367 PMC: 8882327. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2021-0304.R1.


References
1.
Heinl P, Muller L, Korner C, Singer R, Muller F . Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater. 2008; 4(5):1536-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013. View

2.
Mullen L, Stamp R, Brooks W, Jones E, Sutcliffe C . Selective Laser Melting: a regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 89(2):325-334. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31219. View

3.
Ghouse S, Reznikov N, Boughton O, Babu S, Ng K, Blunn G . The Design and Testing of a Locally Stiffness-Matched Porous Scaffold. Appl Mater Today. 2019; 15:377-388. PMC: 6609455. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.017. View

4.
Cahill S, Lohfeld S, McHugh P . Finite element predictions compared to experimental results for the effective modulus of bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009; 20(6):1255-62. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3693-5. View

5.
Han C, Li Y, Wang Q, Wen S, Wei Q, Yan C . Continuous functionally graded porous titanium scaffolds manufactured by selective laser melting for bone implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 80:119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.013. View