The Glutamatergic Synapse: a Complex Machinery for Information Processing

Overview

Journal Cogn Neurodyn

Publisher Springer

Specialty Neurology

Date 2021 Oct 4

PMID 34603541

Citations 13

Authors

Vito Di Maio

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Being the most abundant synaptic type, the glutamatergic synapse is responsible for the larger part of the brain's information processing. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the basic mechanism of synaptic transmission, the glutamatergic synapse shows a large variation in the response to the presynaptic release of the neurotransmitter. This variability is observed not only among different synapses but also in the same single synapse. The synaptic response variability is due to several mechanisms of control of the information transferred among the neurons and suggests that the glutamatergic synapse is not a simple bridge for the transfer of information but plays an important role in its elaboration and management. The control of the synaptic information is operated at pre, post, and extrasynaptic sites in a sort of cooperation between the pre and postsynaptic neurons which also involves the activity of other neurons. The interaction between the different mechanisms of control is extremely complicated and its complete functionality is far from being fully understood. The present review, although not exhaustively, is intended to outline the most important of these mechanisms and their complexity, the understanding of which will be among the most intriguing challenges of future neuroscience.

Citing Articles

Unveiling Glutamate Dynamics: Cognitive Demands in Human Short-Term Memory Learning Across Frontal and Parieto-Occipital Cortex: A Functional MRS Study.

Mohammadi H, Jamshidi S, Khajehpour H, Adibi I, Rahimiforoushani A, Karimi S J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024; 14(6):519-532.

PMID: 39726886 PMC: 11668935. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2407-1789.

A-mediated synaptic glutamate dynamics and calcium dynamics in astrocytes associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Li Y, Yang X Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(6):3401-3426.

PMID: 39712135 PMC: 11655814. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10064-6.

Synaptic changes in psychiatric and neurological disorders: state-of-the art of in vivo imaging.

Howes O, Marcinkowska J, Turkheimer F, Carr R Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024; 50(1):164-183.

PMID: 39134769 PMC: 11525650. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01943-x.

RNA editing regulates glutamatergic synapses in the frontal cortex of a molecular subtype of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Karagianni K, Dafou D, Xanthopoulos K, Sklaviadis T, Kanata E Mol Med. 2024; 30(1):101.

PMID: 38997636 PMC: 11241978. DOI: 10.1186/s10020-024-00863-2.

Paternal aging impacts expression and epigenetic markers as early as the first embryonic tissue lineage differentiation.

Denomme M, McCallie B, Haywood M, Parks J, Schoolcraft W, Katz-Jaffe M Hum Genomics. 2024; 18(1):32.

PMID: 38532526 PMC: 10964547. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-024-00599-4.

References

KOESTER H, Sakmann B . Calcium dynamics in single spines during coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity depend on relative timing of back-propagating action potentials and subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(16):9596-601. PMC: 21384. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9596. View

De Pitta M, Volman V, Berry H, Parpura V, Volterra A, Ben-Jacob E . Computational quest for understanding the role of astrocyte signaling in synaptic transmission and plasticity. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012; 6:98. PMC: 3528083. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00098. View

Sabatini B, Svoboda K . Analysis of calcium channels in single spines using optical fluctuation analysis. Nature. 2000; 408(6812):589-93. DOI: 10.1038/35046076. View

Lu W, Man H, Ju W, Trimble W, MacDonald J, Wang Y . Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron. 2001; 29(1):243-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00194-5. View

Clements J, Feltz A, Sahara Y, Westbrook G . Activation kinetics of AMPA receptor channels reveal the number of functional agonist binding sites. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(1):119-27. PMC: 6793380. View

Hu E, Mergenthal A, Bingham C, Song D, Bouteiller J, Berger T . A Glutamatergic Spine Model to Enable Multi-Scale Modeling of Nonlinear Calcium Dynamics. Front Comput Neurosci. 2018; 12:58. PMC: 6072875. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2018.00058. View

Fang Q, Lindau M . How could SNARE proteins open a fusion pore?. Physiology (Bethesda). 2014; 29(4):278-85. PMC: 4103061. DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00026.2013. View

Di Maio V . Regulation of information passing by synaptic transmission: a short review. Brain Res. 2008; 1225:26-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.016. View

Rumsey C, Abbott L . Synaptic democracy in active dendrites. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 96(5):2307-18. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00149.2006. View

10.

Faber D, Young W, Legendre P, Korn H . Intrinsic quantal variability due to stochastic properties of receptor-transmitter interactions. Science. 1992; 258(5087):1494-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1279813. View

11.

Hausser M . Synaptic function: dendritic democracy. Curr Biol. 2001; 11(1):R10-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00034-8. View

12.

Chapman E . Synaptotagmin: a Ca(2+) sensor that triggers exocytosis?. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3(7):498-508. DOI: 10.1038/nrm855. View

13.

Holderith N, Lorincz A, Katona G, Rozsa B, Kulik A, Watanabe M . Release probability of hippocampal glutamatergic terminals scales with the size of the active zone. Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15(7):988-97. PMC: 3386897. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3137. View

14.

Sanz-Clemente A, Nicoll R, Roche K . Diversity in NMDA receptor composition: many regulators, many consequences. Neuroscientist. 2012; 19(1):62-75. PMC: 3567917. DOI: 10.1177/1073858411435129. View

15.

Sheng M, Sabatini B, Sudhof T . Synapses and Alzheimer's disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012; 4(5). PMC: 3331702. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005777. View

16.

Nusser Z, Lujan R, Laube G, Roberts J, Molnar E, Somogyi P . Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron. 1998; 21(3):545-59. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80565-6. View

17.

Dobrunz L, Stevens C . Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses. Neuron. 1997; 18(6):995-1008. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80338-4. View

18.

Raghavachari S, Lisman J . Properties of quantal transmission at CA1 synapses. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(4):2456-67. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00258.2004. View

19.

Rozsa B, Zelles T, Vizi E, Lendvai B . Distance-dependent scaling of calcium transients evoked by backpropagating spikes and synaptic activity in dendrites of hippocampal interneurons. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(3):661-70. PMC: 6729270. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3906-03.2004. View

20.

Eggermont J . Is there a neural code?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998; 22(2):355-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00021-3. View