» Articles » PMID: 34602991

What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Oct 4
PMID 34602991
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Message credibility is among crucial aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand message credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of humans performing credibility evaluations. Nevertheless, message credibility has never been investigated using such a method before. This article reports the results of an experiment during which we have measured brain activity during message credibility evaluation, using EEG. The experiment allowed for identification of brain areas that were active when participant made positive or negative message credibility evaluations. Based on experimental data, we modeled and predicted human message credibility evaluations using EEG brain activity measurements with F1 score exceeding 0.7.

Citing Articles

Message development for a communication campaign to support health warning labels on cigars: a qualitative study.

Enyioha C, Clark S, Jarman K, Philips R, Kleber S, Thrasher J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3535.

PMID: 39702107 PMC: 11660663. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21097-1.


Investigating brain cortical activity in patients with post-COVID-19 brain fog.

Wojcik G, Shriki O, Kwasniewicz L, Kawiak A, Ben-Horin Y, Furman S Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1019778.

PMID: 36845422 PMC: 9947499. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1019778.


Modeling and Comparing Brain Processes in Message and Earned Source Credibility Evaluation.

Schneider P, Wojcik G, Kawiak A, Kwasniewicz L, Wierzbicki A Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:808382.

PMID: 35601908 PMC: 9121397. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.808382.

References
1.
Rule N, Krendl A, Ivcevic Z, Ambady N . Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: behavioral and neural correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 104(3):409-26. DOI: 10.1037/a0031050. View

2.
Heekeren H, Wartenburger I, Schmidt H, Schwintowski H, Villringer A . An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(9):1215-9. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200307010-00005. View

3.
Kim S, Chung Y, Perry M, Kawachi I, Subramanian S . Association between interpersonal trust, reciprocity, and depression in South Korea: a prospective analysis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e30602. PMC: 3261209. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030602. View

4.
Krueger F, McCabe K, Moll J, Kriegeskorte N, Zahn R, Strenziok M . Neural correlates of trust. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(50):20084-9. PMC: 2148426. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710103104. View

5.
Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M . How Localized are Language Brain Areas? A Review of Brodmann Areas Involvement in Oral Language. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015; 31(1):112-22. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acv081. View