Maintenance of Physical Activity Level, Functioning and Health After Non-pharmacological Treatment of Pelvic Girdle Pain with Either Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation or Acupuncture: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2021 Oct 2

PMID 34598980

Citations 1

Authors

Annika Svahn Ekdahl

Monika Fagevik Olsen

Tove Jendman

Annelie Gutke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate if there are differences between acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as treatment for pelvic girdle pain (PGP) in pregnancy in order to manage pain and thus maintain health and functioning in daily activities and physical activity (PA).

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting And Participants: Pregnant women (n=113) with clinically verified PGP in gestational weeks 12-28, recruited from maternity healthcare centres, randomised (1:1) into two groups.

Exclusion Criteria: any obstetrical complication, systemic disease or previous disorder that could contradict tests or treatment.

Interventions: The intervention consisted of either 10 acupuncture sessions (two sessions per week) provided by a physiotherapist or daily home-based TENS during 5 weeks.

Primary Outcome Variables: Disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functioning (Patient Specific Functional Scale), work ability (Work Ability Index) and PA-level according to general recommendations.

Secondary Outcome Variables: Functioning related to PGP (Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire), evening pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), concern about pain (NRS), health (EuroQoL 5-dimension), symptoms of depression/catastrophising (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale/Coping Strategies Questionnaire).

Results: No mean differences were detected between the groups. Both groups managed to preserve their functioning and PA level at follow-up. This may be due to significantly (p<0.05) reduced within groups evening pain intensity; acupuncture -0.96 (95% CI -1.91 to -0.01; p=0.049), TENS -1.29 (95% CI -2.13 to -0.44; p=0.003) and concern about pain; acupuncture -1.44 (95% CI -2.31 to -0.57; p=0.0012), TENS -1.99 (95% CI -2.81 to -1.17; p<0.0001). The acupuncture group showed an improvement in functioning at follow-up; 0.82 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.63; p=0.048) CONCLUSION: Treating PGP with acupuncture or TENS resulted in maintenance of functioning and physical activity and also less pain and concern about pain. Either intervention could be recommended as a non-pharmacological alternative for pain relief and may enable pregnant women to stay active.

Trial Registration Number: 12726. https://www.researchweb.org/is/sverige/project/127261.

Citing Articles

Neuromodulation for Headache Management in Pregnancy.

Smirnoff L, Bravo M, Hyppolite T Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025; 29(1):14.

PMID: 39777577 PMC: 11706918. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01344-1.

Analgesic Efficacy of Acupuncture on Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.

Lin K, Chang Y, Lu W, Kotha P, Chen Y, Tu C Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 36981487 PMC: 10048458. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060830.

References

Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard H . Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(3):267-71. PMC: 3610523. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7. View

Sydsjo A, Alexanderson K, Dastserri M, Sydsjo G . Gender differences in sick leave related to back pain diagnoses: influence of pregnancy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(4):385-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048467.77507.FC. View

Mackenzie J, Murray E, Lusher J . Women's experiences of pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2017; 56:102-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.10.011. View

Elden H, Ladfors L, Fagevik Olsen M, Ostgaard H, Hagberg H . Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2005; 330(7494):761. PMC: 555879. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38397.507014.E0. View

Aldabe D, Milosavljevic S, Bussey M . Is pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain associated with altered kinematic, kinetic and motor control of the pelvis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(9):1777-87. PMC: 3459120. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2401-1. View

Elden H, Gutke A, Kjellby-Wendt G, Fagevik-Olsen M, Ostgaard H . Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17:276. PMC: 4941027. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1154-0. View

Haakstad L, Voldner N, Henriksen T, Bo K . Physical activity level and weight gain in a cohort of pregnant Norwegian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(5):559-64. DOI: 10.1080/00016340601185301. View

Davenport M, Ruchat S, Poitras V, Garcia A, Gray C, Barrowman N . Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52(21):1367-1375. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099355. View

Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard K, Mogren I . Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):399. PMC: 5602957. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5. View

10.

Olsson C, Nilsson-Wikmar L . Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83(4):351-7. View

11.

Gutke A, Olsson C, Vollestad N, Oberg B, Nilsson Wikmar L, Robinson H . Association between lumbopelvic pain, disability and sick leave during pregnancy – a comparison of three Scandinavian cohorts. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46(5):468-74. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1801. View

12.

Mitchell A, Gilboa S, Werler M, Kelley K, Louik C, Hernandez-Diaz S . Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(1):51.e1-8. PMC: 3793635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.029. View

13.

Hjermstad M, Fayers P, Haugen D, Caraceni A, Hanks G, Loge J . Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011; 41(6):1073-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016. View

14.

Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B . Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(13):1430-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a673. View

15.

Johnson M . Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(4). PMC: 8070828. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040378. View

16.

Virgara R, Maher C, Van Kessel G . The comorbidity of low back pelvic pain and risk of depression and anxiety in pregnancy in primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):288. PMC: 6032543. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1929-4. View

17.

Springer B, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill N . Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009; 30(1):8-15. DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200704000-00003. View

18.

Westaway M, Stratford P, Binkley J . The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998; 27(5):331-8. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331. View

19.

Gutke A, Kjellby-Wendt G, Oberg B . The inter-rater reliability of a standardised classification system for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Man Ther. 2009; 15(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.05.005. View

20.

Truong B, Lupattelli A, Kristensen P, Nordeng H . Sick leave and medication use in pregnancy: a European web-based study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(8):e014934. PMC: 5724093. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014934. View