» Articles » PMID: 34596836

A Machine Learning Risk Model Based on Preoperative Computed Tomography Scan to Predict Postoperative Outcomes After Pancreatoduodenectomy

Overview
Journal Updates Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Oct 1
PMID 34596836
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a life-threatening complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Individualized preoperative risk assessment could improve clinical management and prevent or mitigate adverse outcomes. The aim of this study is to develop a machine learning risk model to predict occurrence of CR-POPF after PD from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. A total of 100 preoperative high-quality CT scans of consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our institution between 2011 and 2019 were analyzed. Radiomic and morphological features extracted from CT scans related to pancreatic anatomy and patient characteristics were included as variables. These data were then assessed by a machine learning classifier to assess the risk of developing CR-POPF. Among the 100 patients evaluated, 20 had CR-POPF. The predictive model based on logistic regression demonstrated specificity of 0.824 (0.133) and sensitivity of 0.571 (0.337), with an AUC of 0.807 (0.155), PPV of 0.468 (0.310) and NPV of 0.890 (0.084). The performance of the model minimally decreased utilizing a random forest approach, with specificity of 0.914 (0.106), sensitivity of 0.424 (0.346), AUC of 0.749 (0.209), PPV of 0.502 (0.414) and NPV of 0.869 (0.076). Interestingly, using the same data, the model was also able to predict postoperative overall complications and a postoperative length of stay over the median with AUCs of 0.690 (0.209) and 0.709 (0.160), respectively. These findings suggest that preoperative CT scans evaluated by machine learning may provide a novel set of information to help clinicians choose a tailored therapeutic pathway in patients candidated to pancreatoduodenectomy.

Citing Articles

Risk stratification of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. How far are we? A scoping review.

Alhulaili Z, Pleijhuis R, Hoogwater F, Nijkamp M, Klaase J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):62.

PMID: 39915344 PMC: 11802655. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03581-9.


Radiomics and 256-slice-dual-energy CT in the automated diagnosis of mild acute pancreatitis: the innovation of formal methods and high-resolution CT.

Rocca A, Brunese M, Santone A, Varriano G, Vigano L, Caiazzo C Radiol Med. 2024; 129(10):1444-1453.

PMID: 39214954 PMC: 11480164. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01878-9.


Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.

Brydges G, Uppal A, Gottumukkala V Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2727-2747.

PMID: 38785488 PMC: 11120613. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050207.


Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives.

Yang F, Windsor J, Fu D World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(10):1329-1345.

PMID: 38596504 PMC: 11000089. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1329.


Deep learning-based prediction of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula.

Lee W, Park H, Lee H, Song K, Hwang D, Lee J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5089.

PMID: 38429308 PMC: 10907568. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51777-2.


References
1.
Pratt W, Maithel S, Vanounou T, Huang Z, Callery M, Vollmer Jr C . Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(3):443-51. PMC: 1877022. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2. View

2.
Kalish B, Vollmer C, Kent T, Nealon W, Tseng J, Callery M . Quality assessment in pancreatic surgery: what might tomorrow require?. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 17(1):86-93. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2052-x. View

3.
Ahmad S, Edwards M, Sutton J, Grewal S, Hanseman D, Maithel S . Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012; 256(3):529-37. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265ef0b. View

4.
Williamsson C, Ansari D, Andersson R, Tingstedt B . Postoperative pancreatic fistula-impact on outcome, hospital cost and effects of centralization. HPB (Oxford). 2017; 19(5):436-442. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.004. View

5.
Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, Tavernier M, Zerbib P, Michot F . Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg. 2008; 197(6):702-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004. View