» Articles » PMID: 34596834

Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation with MicroPulse® Laser Versus Cyclophotocoagulation with Continuous Diode Laser in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma

Overview
Journal Int Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Oct 1
PMID 34596834
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To present the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of moderate to advanced stage of open-angle glaucoma using the surgical method of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with MicroPulse® laser (Iridex, Silicon Valley, California, USA) and to compare these results with those of continuous transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with diode laser.

Methods: In a prospective observational clinical study 22 patients (30 eyes) with moderate and advanced open-angle glaucoma underwent transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. 15 eyes were treated with transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with MicroPulse® laser with 2500 mW (group A) and 15 eyes with continuous diode laser 810 nm and power between 2000 and 2300 mW (group B). The follow-up period of the study was 12 months.

Results: A reduction of the intraocular pressure > 30% was achieved in 53.3% of the group A and in 60% of the group B during the follow-up period of 12 months. A statistically significant decrease of the number of antiglaucoma agents was observed in group A. One eye (6.6%) of group A underwent additional antiglaucoma procedures to achieve target intraocular pressure. The corresponding percentage is 40% in group B. The postoperative inflammatory response was significantly more limited in group A compared to group B.

Conclusions: The transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with MicroPulse® diode laser with 2500 mW achieves a similar decrease of the intraocular pressure as cyclophotocoagulation with continuous diode laser for the first postoperative months, but more satisfactory reduction of the number of eye drops as well as more limited postoperative inflammatory response.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation (Ab Externo, Open Conjunctival Approach) versus Trabeculectomy: A Real-World Study.

Park H, Cho H, Kim H, Lee J, Kim C, Bae H Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024; 39(1):1-13.

PMID: 39715709 PMC: 11856050. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2024.0091.


Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management.

Kim E, Walker B, Hopkins N, Fowler S, Jerkins B, Kanner E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407813 PMC: 11476880. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195753.


Comparison of treatment outcomes between slow coagulation transscleral cyclophotocoagulation and micropulse transscleral laser treatment.

Hwang Y, Lee S, Kim M, Choi J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23944.

PMID: 39397105 PMC: 11471840. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75246-y.


Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Non-Incisional Eyes with Ocular Hypertension and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Murtaza F, Kaba Q, Somani S, Tam E, Yuen D Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1295-1312.

PMID: 38751993 PMC: 11095520. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S447875.


The efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral laser treatment in glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ling Q, Cai Z, Zhang X, Duan X BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):263.

PMID: 37308944 PMC: 10259047. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03017-w.


References
1.
Sanchez F, Peirano-Bonomi J, Grippo T . Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation: A Hypothesis for the Ideal Parameters. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2018; 7(3):94-100. PMC: 6205680. View