» Articles » PMID: 34595114

Construction and Validation of Novel Prediction Tools Based on Large Population-Based Database to Predict the Prognosis of Urachal Cancer After Surgery

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Oct 1
PMID 34595114
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Urachal cancer is a rare neoplasm in the urological system. To our knowledge, no published study has explored to establish a model for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer. The present study aims to develop and validate nomograms for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer based on clinicopathological parameters.

Methods: Based on the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 445 patients diagnosed with urachal cancer between 1975 and 2018 were identified as training and internal validation cohort; 84 patients diagnosed as urachal cancer from 2001 to 2020 in two medical centers were collected as external validation cohort. Nomograms were developed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the training cohort, and their performance was evaluated in terms of its discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness by statistical analysis.

Results: Three nomograms based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM), Sheldon and Mayo staging system were developed for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) of urachal cancer; these nomograms all showed similar calibration and discrimination ability. Further internal (c-index 0.78) and external (c-index 0.81) validation suggested that Sheldon model had superior discrimination and calibration ability in predicting CSS than the other two models. Moreover, we found that the Sheldon model was able to successfully classify patients into different risk of mortality both in internal and external validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis proved that the nomogram was clinically useful and applicable.

Conclusions: The nomogram model with Sheldon staging system was recommended for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer. The proposed nomograms have promising clinical applicability to help clinicians on individualized patient counseling, decision-making, and clinical trial designing.

Citing Articles

Acute Glomerulonephritis as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome Secondary to Urachal Adenocarcinoma: An Unknown Entity.

Bermudez Barrientos C, Ramos Portales M, Mendoza Villalobos E, Moreno Jaime B Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60106.

PMID: 38860075 PMC: 11164558. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60106.

References
1.
Jung H, Sun J, Park S, Kwon G, Lim H . Treatment Outcome and Relevance of Palliative Chemotherapy in Urachal Cancer. Chemotherapy. 2014; 60(2):73-80. DOI: 10.1159/000368071. View

2.
Harrell Jr F, Califf R, Pryor D, Lee K, Rosati R . Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982; 247(18):2543-6. View

3.
Bruins H, Visser O, Ploeg M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Kiemeney L, Witjes J . The clinical epidemiology of urachal carcinoma: results of a large, population based study. J Urol. 2012; 188(4):1102-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.020. View

4.
Vickers A, Elkin E . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-74. PMC: 2577036. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. View

5.
Molina J, Quevedo J, Furth A, Richardson R, Zincke H, Burch P . Predictors of survival from urachal cancer: a Mayo Clinic study of 49 cases. Cancer. 2007; 110(11):2434-40. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23070. View