» Articles » PMID: 34594212

Semantic Congruence Drives Long-Term Memory and Similarly Affects Neural Retrieval Dynamics in Young and Older Adults

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2021 Oct 1
PMID 34594212
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning novel information can be promoted if it is congruent with already stored knowledge. This so-called semantic congruence effect has been broadly studied in healthy young adults with a focus on neural encoding mechanisms. However, the impacts on retrieval, and possible impairments during healthy aging, which is typically associated with changes in declarative long-term memory, remain unclear. To investigate these issues, we used a previously established paradigm in healthy young and older humans with a focus on the neural activity at a final retrieval stage as measured with electroencephalography (EEG). In both age groups, semantic congruence at encoding enhanced subsequent long-term recognition memory of words. Compatible with this observation, semantic congruence led to differences in event-related potentials (ERPs) at retrieval, and this effect was not modulated by age. Specifically, congruence modulated old/new ERPs at a fronto-central (Fz) and left parietal (P3) electrode in a late (400-600 ms) time window, which has previously been associated with recognition memory processes. Importantly, ERPs to old items also correlated with the positive effect of semantic congruence on long-term memory independent of age. Together, our findings suggest that semantic congruence drives subsequent recognition memory across the lifespan through changes in neural retrieval processes.

Citing Articles

Functional segregation of rostral and caudal hippocampus in associative memory.

Vorobiova A, Feurra M, Pavone E, Stieglitz L, Imbach L, Moiseeva V Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1509163.

PMID: 39996022 PMC: 11848949. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1509163.


Set Size of Information in Long-Term Memory Similarly Modulates Retrieval Dynamics in Young and Older Adults.

Peters J, Steiger T, Sobczak A, Bunzeck N Front Psychol. 2022; 13:817929.

PMID: 35310276 PMC: 8924055. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817929.

References
1.
Dodson C, Bawa S, Slotnick S . Aging, source memory, and misrecollections. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):169-81. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.169. View

2.
Tromp D, Dufour A, Lithfous S, Pebayle T, Despres O . Episodic memory in normal aging and Alzheimer disease: Insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2015; 24(Pt B):232-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.08.006. View

3.
Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53(4):695-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. View

4.
Maris E, Oostenveld R . Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 164(1):177-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024. View

5.
Freitas S, Simoes M, Alves L, Santana I . Montreal cognitive assessment: validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011; 27(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182420bfe. View