» Articles » PMID: 34586483

Prospective Evaluation of an Evidence-based Decision Tool to Assess Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma (BAT)

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 29
PMID 34586483
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) is currently the standard for evaluation of intra-abdominal injury (IAI) after BAT. Pediatric patients receiving CT scans based on adult clinical protocols are potentially exposed to unnecessary radiation. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of CT scans before and after implementation of a pediatric BAT decision tool.

Methods: We adapted and implemented an evidence-based decision tool for pediatric BAT based on five clinical variables. We reviewed patient charts 18 months pre- and post-implementation. Demographics and outcomes were compared using Chi-square and Fisher's exact test, accordingly.

Results: The pre and post-implementation groups were uniform when comparing age, sex, mechanism, and Injury Severity Score. The decision tool was utilized in 85% of patients post-implementation. Fewer CT scans were obtained in the post-implementation group (28 vs. 21%, p = 0.215) with no missed injuries or late diagnoses.

Conclusion: Implementation of a pediatric BAT decision tool decreased CT usage and radiation exposure without an obvious compromise to patient care. This experience supports the utilization of these tools for the assessment of IAI after BAT and have resulted in more selective use of CT during pediatric BAT in our program.

Citing Articles

Management of Pediatric Solid Organ Injuries.

Lyttle B, Williams R, Stylianos S Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929246 PMC: 11202015. DOI: 10.3390/children11060667.


Scoring Tool to Predict Need for Early Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) After Pediatric Trauma.

Kazempoor B, Nahmias J, Clark I, Schubl S, Lekawa M, Swentek L World J Surg. 2023; 47(11):2925-2931.

PMID: 37653348 PMC: 10545564. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07141-y.


[Blunt abdominal trauma in children and adolescents: treatment concepts in the acute phase].

Schunn M, Schafer J, Neunhoeffer F, Lieber J, Fuchs J Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 94(7):651-663.

PMID: 37338573 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01798-2.

References
1.
Wegner S, Colletti J, Van Wie D . Pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006; 53(2):243-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2006.02.002. View

2.
Larson D, Johnson L, Schnell B, Salisbury S, Forman H . National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology. 2010; 258(1):164-73. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100640. View

3.
Tillou A, Gupta M, Baraff L, Schriger D, Hoffman J, Hiatt J . Is the use of pan-computed tomography for blunt trauma justified? A prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 2009; 67(4):779-87. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b5f2eb. View

4.
Larson D, Johnson L, Schnell B, Goske M, Salisbury S, Forman H . Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008. Radiology. 2011; 259(3):793-801. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101939. View

5.
Streck C, Vogel A, Zhang J, Huang E, Santore M, Tsao K . Identifying Children at Very Low Risk for Blunt Intra-Abdominal Injury in Whom CT of the Abdomen Can Be Avoided Safely. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224(4):449-458.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.041. View