» Articles » PMID: 34586412

Imaging the Living Plant Cell: From Probes to Quantification

Overview
Journal Plant Cell
Specialties Biology
Cell Biology
Date 2021 Sep 29
PMID 34586412
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

At the center of cell biology is our ability to image the cell and its various components, either in isolation or within an organism. Given its importance, biological imaging has emerged as a field of its own, which is inherently highly interdisciplinary. Indeed, biologists rely on physicists and engineers to build new microscopes and imaging techniques, chemists to develop better imaging probes, and mathematicians and computer scientists for image analysis and quantification. Live imaging collectively involves all the techniques aimed at imaging live samples. It is a rapidly evolving field, with countless new techniques, probes, and dyes being continuously developed. Some of these new methods or reagents are readily amenable to image plant samples, while others are not and require specific modifications for the plant field. Here, we review some recent advances in live imaging of plant cells. In particular, we discuss the solutions that plant biologists use to live image membrane-bound organelles, cytoskeleton components, hormones, and the mechanical properties of cells or tissues. We not only consider the imaging techniques per se, but also how the construction of new fluorescent probes and analysis pipelines are driving the field of plant cell biology.

Citing Articles

The viscoelastic properties of Nicotiana tabacum BY-2 suspension cell lines adapted to high osmolarity.

Skrzypczak T, Pochylski M, Rapp M, Wojtaszek P, Kasprowicz-Maluski A BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):255.

PMID: 39994523 PMC: 11852555. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06232-3.


Super-califragilisticexpialidocious-resolution microscopy: How expansion microscopy can be applied to plants.

Chakraborty S Plant Cell. 2025; 37(2).

PMID: 39847525 PMC: 11827608. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koaf002.


Microfluidics to Follow Spatiotemporal Dynamics at the Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Interface During Plant Root Growth.

Dupouy G, Singh G, Schmidt-Speicher L, Hoffmann E, Baudrey S, Ahrens R Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2873:223-245.

PMID: 39576605 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4228-3_13.


Organelle Interactions in Plant Cells.

Hall M, Kunjumon T, Ghosh P, Currie L, Mathur J Results Probl Cell Differ. 2024; 73:43-69.

PMID: 39242374 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-62036-2_3.


Precise tracking of nanoparticles in plant roots.

Sun X, Ma J, Feng L, Duan J, Yuan X Nat Protoc. 2024; 20(1):248-271.

PMID: 39237831 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-024-01044-5.


References
1.
Ulmasov T, Murfett J, Hagen G, Guilfoyle T . Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell. 1997; 9(11):1963-71. PMC: 157050. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.11.1963. View

2.
Noack L, Jaillais Y . Precision targeting by phosphoinositides: how PIs direct endomembrane trafficking in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017; 40:22-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.017. View

3.
Marhava P, Hoermayer L, Yoshida S, Marhavy P, Benkova E, Friml J . Re-activation of Stem Cell Pathways for Pattern Restoration in Plant Wound Healing. Cell. 2019; 177(4):957-969.e13. PMC: 6506278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.015. View

4.
Komis G, Novak D, Ovecka M, Samajova O, Samaj J . Advances in Imaging Plant Cell Dynamics. Plant Physiol. 2017; 176(1):80-93. PMC: 5761809. DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.00962. View

5.
Nakamura M, Naoi K, Shoji T, Hashimoto T . Low concentrations of propyzamide and oryzalin alter microtubule dynamics in Arabidopsis epidermal cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004; 45(9):1330-4. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pch300. View