» Articles » PMID: 34586234

Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation by Candida Albicans and Candida Krusei in Different Types of Contact Lenses

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Sep 29
PMID 34586234
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the Candida krusei and Candida albicans biofilm formation abilities on 5 different types of contact lenses and compare their metabolic activities and biomass.

Methods: After biofilm formation by both the test species, their metabolic activity was assessed by the 2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide reduction assay with menadione, while the biomass was determined by staining with 0.4% crystal violet dye for further statistical analysis.

Results: Both the Candida species could form biofilms on different types of contact lenses, with greater metabolic activities and lower biomass formation in rigid gas permeable lenses.

Conclusion: Biofilm formation with greater metabolic activity and greater biomass were expected on soft contact lenses considering their surface hydrophobicity. However, the results demonstrated a greater metabolic activity on rigid contact lenses. This result has a great significance with regards to the increasing risk of microbial keratitis, although further studies are warranted to better elucidate the formation of biofilms on different types of contact lens materials in the future.

Citing Articles

The Role of Biofilms in Contact Lens Associated Fungal Keratitis.

Yi J, Sun Y, Zeng C, Kostoulias X, Qu Y Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37887234 PMC: 10604847. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101533.


Candida Biofilm Eye Infection: Main Aspects and Advance in Novel Agents as Potential Source of Treatment.

Petrillo F, Sinoca M, Fea A, Galdiero M, Maione A, Galdiero E Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37627697 PMC: 10451181. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081277.

References
1.
Melo A, Bizerra F, Freymuller E, Arthington-Skaggs B, Colombo A . Biofilm production and evaluation of antifungal susceptibility amongst clinical Candida spp. isolates, including strains of the Candida parapsilosis complex. Med Mycol. 2010; 49(3):253-62. DOI: 10.3109/13693786.2010.530032. View

2.
Moragues M, Omaetxebarria M, Elguezabal N, Sevilla M, Conti S, Polonelli L . A monoclonal antibody directed against a Candida albicans cell wall mannoprotein exerts three anti-C. albicans activities. Infect Immun. 2003; 71(9):5273-9. PMC: 187351. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.9.5273-5279.2003. View

3.
Liu Y, Tay J . Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. J Appl Microbiol. 2001; 90(3):337-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01244.x. View

4.
Ko J, Jung D, Lee J, Kim H, Ryu S, Jung S . Changing epidemiology of non-albicans candidemia in Korea. J Infect Chemother. 2018; 25(5):388-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.09.016. View

5.
Ramage G, Vande Walle K, Wickes B, Lopez-Ribot J . Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45(9):2475-9. PMC: 90680. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2475-2479.2001. View