» Articles » PMID: 34584107

Behavioral Gender Differences Are Reinforced During the COVID-19 Crisis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 29
PMID 34584107
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavioral gender differences have been found for a wide range of human activities including the way people communicate, move, provision themselves, or organize leisure activities. Using mobile phone data from 1.2 million devices in Austria (15% of the population) across the first phase of the COVID-19 crisis, we quantify gender-specific patterns of communication intensity, mobility, and circadian rhythms. We show the resilience of behavioral patterns with respect to the shock imposed by a strict nation-wide lock-down that Austria experienced in the beginning of the crisis with severe implications on public and private life. We find drastic differences in gender-specific responses during the different phases of the pandemic. After the lock-down gender differences in mobility and communication patterns increased massively, while circadian rhythms tended to synchronize. In particular, women had fewer but longer phone calls than men during the lock-down. Mobility declined massively for both genders, however, women tended to restrict their movement stronger than men. Women showed a stronger tendency to avoid shopping centers and more men frequented recreational areas. After the lock-down, males returned back to normal quicker than women; young age-cohorts return much quicker. Differences are driven by the young and adolescent population. An age stratification highlights the role of retirement on behavioral differences. We find that the length of a day of men and women is reduced by 1 h. We interpret and discuss these findings as signals for underlying social, biological and psychological gender differences when coping with crisis and taking risks.

Citing Articles

Long COVID patients' brain activation is suppressed during walking and severer symptoms lead to stronger suppression.

Chen G, Liu Q, Chen J, Cai G, Tan C, Zhao Y Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024; 274(8):1887-1901.

PMID: 39212724 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-024-01870-4.


Epidemic modelling suggests that in specific circumstances masks may become more effective when fewer contacts wear them.

Klimek P, Ledebur K, Thurner S Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):134.

PMID: 38971886 PMC: 11227579. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00561-4.


Impact of leisure satisfaction on perceived risk of infectious disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from new worker classes.

Kim Y, Ban Y, Kang S Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1229571.

PMID: 38259785 PMC: 10800411. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1229571.


Spatial, temporal, and motivational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nature-based leisure activity - A global survey of birders.

Randler C, Jokimaki J, de Salvo M, de Almeida Barbosa R, Staller N, Tryjanowski P iScience. 2023; 26(8):107483.

PMID: 37588164 PMC: 10425937. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107483.


The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily rhythms.

Luong N, Barnett I, Aledavood T J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(12):1943-1953.

PMID: 37550242 PMC: 10654873. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad140.


References
1.
Desvars-Larrive A, Dervic E, Haug N, Niederkrotenthaler T, Chen J, Di Natale A . A structured open dataset of government interventions in response to COVID-19. Sci Data. 2020; 7(1):285. PMC: 7452888. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00609-9. View

2.
Moran K, Del Valle S . A Meta-Analysis of the Association between Gender and Protective Behaviors in Response to Respiratory Epidemics and Pandemics. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164541. PMC: 5074573. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164541. View

3.
Torok J, Murase Y, Jo H, Kertesz J, Kaski K . What Big Data tells: Sampling the social network by communication channels. Phys Rev E. 2016; 94(5-1):052319. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052319. View

4.
Szell M, Thurner S . How women organize social networks different from men. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:1214. PMC: 3566601. DOI: 10.1038/srep01214. View

5.
Stein M, Walker J, Forde D . Gender differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2000; 38(6):619-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00098-4. View