Reactivity to UV Radiation Exposure Monitoring Using Personal Exposure Devices for Skin Cancer Prevention: Longitudinal Observational Study

Overview

Journal JMIR Mhealth Uhealth

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Medical Informatics

Date 2021 Sep 28

PMID 34581683

Citations 4

Authors

Bridget G Parsons

Elizabeth S Nagelhout

Ali P Wankier

Nan Hu

Riley Lensink

Angela Zhu

Katy Nottingham

Douglas Grossman

Jakob D Jensen

Yelena P Wu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Emerging UV radiation (UVR) monitoring devices may present an opportunity to integrate such technology into skin cancer prevention interventions. However, little is known about the effects of using a wearable UVR monitor on adults' and children's sun protection-related behaviors and attitudes (eg, cancer worry and perceived risk). Understanding the potential role of reactivity and seasonal effects will help inform the use of objective monitors in the context of skin cancer prevention research, including intervention studies.

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the potential reactivity associated with a wearable personal UVR monitor, specifically the effects associated with reported sun-protective behaviors and skin cancer-related attitudes, which are often the targets of skin cancer preventive interventions.

Methods: Child-parent dyads (n=97 dyads) were asked to wear a UVR monitoring device during waking hours for 2 weeks. Participants were asked to sync the device daily with a smartphone app that stored the UVR exposure data. Participants were blinded to their UVR exposure data during the 2-week period; thus, the smartphone app provided no feedback to the participants on their UVR exposure. Participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing sun-protective behaviors, sunburn, tanning, skin self-examination, skin cancer-related knowledge, perceived risk, cancer worry, response efficacy, and intentions to change behaviors over the 2-week period. Linear regressions were conducted to investigate changes in the outcomes over time and to account for the role of the season of study participation.

Results: Regression results revealed that there was a significant decrease over time for several sun protection outcomes in children, including time spent outdoors on weekends (P=.02) and weekdays (P=.008), sunscreen use (P=.03), reapplication (P<.001), and unintentional tanning (P<.001). There were no significant changes over time in children's and parents' UVR exposure, sunburn occurrence, or sun protection attitudes. Season of participation was associated with several outcomes, including lower sunscreen use (P<.001), reapplication (P<.001), sunburns (P=.01), intentions to change sun-protective behaviors (P=.02), and intentional (P=.008) and unintentional tanning (P=.01) for participants who participated in the fall versus the summer.

Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that daily use of a UVR monitoring device over a 2-week period may result in changes in certain sun-protective behaviors. These results highlight the importance of identifying and addressing potential reactivity to UVR monitoring devices, especially in the context of skin cancer preventive intervention research. Ultimately, objectively assessed UVR exposure could be integrated into the outcome assessment for future testing of skin cancer prevention interventions.

Citing Articles

Reactions to disclosed biofeedback information on skin DNA damage in individuals after a beach holiday: a mixed methods intervention study.

Frederiksen N, Thorsteinsson I, Lerche C, Granborg J, Haedersdal M, Dalum P Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2025; 24(2):235-245.

PMID: 39873906 DOI: 10.1007/s43630-024-00677-5.

Digital Phenotyping in Health Using Machine Learning Approaches: Scoping Review.

Dlima S, Shevade S, Menezes S, Ganju A JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024; 3(1):e39618.

PMID: 38935947 PMC: 11135220. DOI: 10.2196/39618.

Applications of digital Medicine in oncology: Prospects and challenges.

Ge H, Li L, Zhang D, Ma F Cancer Innov. 2023; 1(4):285-292.

PMID: 38089082 PMC: 10686176. DOI: 10.1002/cai2.37.

Objectively-Assessed Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Sunburn Occurrence.

Stump T, Fastner S, Jo Y, Chipman J, Haaland B, Nagelhout E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(7).

PMID: 37047850 PMC: 10094127. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075234.

A UVR-sensor wearable device intervention to reduce sun exposure in melanoma survivors: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Vogel R, Luo X, Brown K, Jewett P, Dona A, Nagler R PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281480.

PMID: 36763627 PMC: 9916644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281480.

References

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

Thieden E, Philipsen P, Wulf H . Ultraviolet radiation exposure pattern in winter compared with summer based on time-stamped personal dosimeter readings. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 154(1):133-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06961.x. View

Wu Y, Parsons B, Aspinwall L, Hay J, Boucher K, Caputo H . Parent and child perspectives on perceived barriers to child sun protection and their association with sun protection strategies among children of melanoma survivors. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019; 36(3):317-323. PMC: 6525049. DOI: 10.1111/pde.13796. View

Clemes S, Matchett N, Wane S . Reactivity: an issue for short-term pedometer studies?. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42(1):68-70. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038521. View

Baumann S, Gross S, Voigt L, Ullrich A, Weymar F, Schwaneberg T . Pitfalls in accelerometer-based measurement of physical activity: The presence of reactivity in an adult population. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017; 28(3):1056-1063. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12977. View

Vandoni M, Correale L, Del Bianco M, Marin L, Codrons E . Does reactivity to accelerometers occur in a single trial? Brief report in a sample of young adults. J Health Psychol. 2016; 22(11):1458-1462. DOI: 10.1177/1359105316628758. View

Nahar V, Allison Ford M, Brodell R, Boyas J, Jacks S, Biviji-Sharma R . Skin cancer prevention practices among malignant melanoma survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015; 142(6):1273-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2086-z. View

Tribby C, Julian A, Oh A, Perna F, Berrigan D . Associations between ultraviolet radiation, tree cover and adolescent sunburns. Int J Health Geogr. 2020; 19(1):59. PMC: 7734787. DOI: 10.1186/s12942-020-00253-x. View

Hillhouse J, Turrisi R, Jaccard J, Robinson J . Accuracy of self-reported sun exposure and sun protection behavior. Prev Sci. 2012; 13(5):519-31. PMC: 3673291. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0278-1. View

10.

Wu Y, Aspinwall L, Conn B, Stump T, Grahmann B, Leachman S . A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk. Prev Med. 2016; 88:153-67. PMC: 4902721. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.010. View

11.

Hacker E, Horsham C, Vagenas D, Jones L, Lowe J, Janda M . A Mobile Technology Intervention With Ultraviolet Radiation Dosimeters and Smartphone Apps for Skin Cancer Prevention in Young Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(11):e199. PMC: 6291679. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9854. View

12.

Andersen P, Buller D, Walkosz B, Scott M, Beck L, Liu X . Environmental variables associated with vacationers' sun protection at warm weather resorts in North America. Environ Res. 2016; 146:200-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.034. View

13.

Silfee V, Haughton C, Jake-Schoffman D, Lopez-Cepero A, May C, Sreedhara M . Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2018; 11:74-80. PMC: 6030233. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.003. View

14.

Andersen P, Buller D, Walkosz B, Scott M, Maloy J, Cutter G . Environmental cues to UV radiation and personal sun protection in outdoor winter recreation. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(11):1241-7. PMC: 3364536. DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.327. View

15.

Thieden E, Agren M, Wulf H . Solar UVR exposures of indoor workers in a Working and a Holiday Period assessed by personal dosimeters and sun exposure diaries. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2001; 17(6):249-55. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2001.170601.x. View

16.

Finch L, Janda M, Loescher L, Hacker E . Can skin cancer prevention be improved through mobile technology interventions? A systematic review. Prev Med. 2016; 90:121-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.037. View

17.

Nigg C . Explaining adolescent exercise behavior change: a longitudinal application of the transtheoretical model. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2301_3. View

18.

Hill D, White V, Marks R, Theobald T, Borland R, Roy C . Melanoma prevention: behavioral and nonbehavioral factors in sunburn among an Australian urban population. Prev Med. 1992; 21(5):654-69. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90072-p. View

19.

Rossi J, Blais L, Redding C, Weinstock M . Preventing skin cancer through behavior change. Implications for interventions. Dermatol Clin. 1995; 13(3):613-22. View

20.

Lubans D, Morgan P, Tudor-Locke C . A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth. Prev Med. 2009; 48(4):307-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.014. View