» Articles » PMID: 34579747

The Efficacy of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34579747
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the most common disorders causing chronic muscle pain. Almost one-third of patients with musculoskeletal complaints meet the MPS criteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) in patients with MPS through a systematic review method.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, PEDro, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched to find out the eligible articles without language limitations from 1990 to December 30, 2020. All relevant randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness of IMES with sham-IMES, dry needling, or exercise therapy in patients with MPS were included. Full texts of the selected studies were critically appraised using Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2).

Results: Six studies (out of 397) had met our inclusion criteria (involving 158 patients) and were entered to the systematic review. Outcome measures examined in these studies included pain, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, biochemical factors, disability, and amount of analgesic use. In the most studies, it has been shown that IMES is more effective than the control group in improving some outcome measurements such as pain.

Conclusion: There is preliminary evidence from a few small trials suggesting the efficacy of IMES for the care of myofascial pain syndrome. The data support the conduct of larger trials investigating the efficacy of IMES.

Citing Articles

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation to Trigger Points: Insights into Mechanisms and Clinical Applications-A Scoping Review.

Perreault T, Ball A, Dommerholt J, Theiss R, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Butts R J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36294360 PMC: 9605351. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206039.


Effect of ischemic compression on myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lu W, Li J, Tian Y, Lu X Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):34.

PMID: 36050701 PMC: 9434898. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00441-5.

References
1.
Gerwin R, Dommerholt J, Shah J . An expansion of Simons' integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004; 8(6):468-75. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-004-0069-x. View

2.
Faghri P, Van Meerdervort H, Glaser R, Figoni S . Electrical stimulation-induced contraction to reduce blood stasis during arthroplasty. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1997; 5(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1109/86.559350. View

3.
Benjaboonyanupap D, Paungmali A, Pirunsan U . Effect of Therapeutic Sequence of Hot Pack and Ultrasound on Physiological Response Over Trigger Point of Upper Trapezius. Asian J Sports Med. 2015; 6(3):e23806. PMC: 4594134. DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.23806. View

4.
Botelho L, Angoleri L, Zortea M, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Torres I . Insights About the Neuroplasticity State on the Effect of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation in Pain and Disability Associated With Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:388. PMC: 6232764. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00388. View

5.
Martin-Pintado-Zugasti A, Mayoral Del Moral O, Gerwin R, Fernandez-Carnero J . Post-needling soreness after myofascial trigger point dry needling: Current status and future research. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018; 22(4):941-946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.003. View